Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SumProVita

Unfortunately, “believably” evil.

I wish that I were shocked, but I am not. I wish that I were suprised, but I am not.

Once you accept the killing of innocent people as moral and right, where can you logically draw the line?

“Ethics” = morals for people that don’t have any.


25 posted on 02/29/2012 1:18:29 PM PST by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man. Never trust anyone who hasn't been punched in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: chesley

I think I’ve got the whole “ethics” vs “morals” thing figured out.

Leftist atheists prefer the term “ethics” because ethics are self defined. This is the “alternate truth” that was offered up in Genesis 3 (you will be as gods, knowing good and evil).

Morals are implicitly objective and external to human definition. Leftists don’t like that. It’s “confining” and “oppressive” and, frankly, insulting to their superior intellect.


29 posted on 02/29/2012 1:21:13 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson