Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Unrepentant for Calling Pro-Contraception Student Sandra Fluke a 'Slut'
Christian Post ^ | 03/02/2012 | By Jonathan Moormann

Posted on 03/02/2012 11:01:30 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: SeekAndFind
.


I have a "nurturing" Theory about Rush's "slut" remarks ...


First, of course, he's correct ... any Woman in any office, bar, church, etc ... who said that she needs $ 3,000 annually to supoort her (unmarried) sexual addiction ...

is accurately called a "slut" ...



However ... there's a chance that Rush deliberately brought the "gasoline AND the matches" and escalated this to a Nuclear DefCon-1 level ...


WHY ?


Perhaps to take the National attention from the Super Tuesday primaries ... Newt's possible strategic gains ... Santorum's lost status ... and Romney's embarrassment ...

After all ... Super Tuesday is already "page six" news for the next week ...



"Just a theory ... that happens to fit the facts ..."

Spock, Star Trek VI, "The Undiscovered Country" ...




.
121 posted on 03/02/2012 6:54:18 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008
I have asthma and diabetes. It costs me $120 a month in co-pays for my medication. These medications are necessary for me to be alive. My medication expense is not paid for by any tax dollars. This "slut" demands that I pay for her birth control pills so that she can have all the sex she wants. Her life is NOT dependant on those birth control pills. Why is her sex life more important than my simply being alive??

Before you propose it, NO, I do not want the government paying for my meds, I don't want the government "giving" me health care, and I sure as hell don't want a government employee between me and my doctor.

If you don't understand that government "free" health care means that the government has complete control of your life, then you must be snorting birth control pills. Government health care will not care for me or any other asthmatic or diabetic or anyone with comorbidity, they will just make us comfortable until we die off. Obama has already stated that the elderly do not deserve high cost health services, instead of a pacemaker, he said they could just take a "pill". Don't you wonder why the advancement of assisted suicide is running parallel with the advancement of government health care??

122 posted on 03/02/2012 7:16:54 PM PST by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I love your reasoning.

Another way to look at this would be if she wanted to drive a car and instead of her paying for her own insurance she demanded the rest of us foot the bill for her own personal pleasure.

As far as I’m concerned if the government can hold men accountable for child support then the same government should hold women accountable for paying for their own contraceptives.


123 posted on 03/02/2012 7:19:50 PM PST by FranklinBasil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

Socialism is a FAILED economic system which is what everyone is arguing about. Feel free to move to Greece and enjoy the Socialist utopia there. Your village is missing its idiot.


124 posted on 03/02/2012 7:32:44 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

“And what about young married couples who don’t yet want to have kids? Or who find out that a genetic condition would make having children inadvisable?”

http://www.amazon.com/Durex-Condoms-Variety-Collection-Condom/dp/B000FCGDHW/ref=dp_cp_ob_hpc_title_0


125 posted on 03/02/2012 8:01:54 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008

“Birth control pills are a legitimate health care need”

BC is NOT a “NEED”, and definitely not a “health” need!

It was intended only to make it easier to have sex and not have babies - that is why it’s called BC. There are only a few uncommon things that are INCIDENTALLY helped by BC pills - but we (and you, by the following phrase in that sentence) are NOT talking about that. We are talking about their original intention, as indicated by the common nickname.

Not have babies is not a “health need”! It has nothing to do with your health!


126 posted on 03/02/2012 9:24:48 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

“I actually had fluke at a restaurant in New York Tuesday night...”

When you say “you had Fluke” ........


127 posted on 03/03/2012 8:23:09 AM PST by jessduntno ("Newt Gingrich was part of the Reagan Revolution's Murderers' Row." - Jeffrey Lord, Reagan Admin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Limbaugh was a fool. Unable to resist his talent for ridicule, he fell right into the trap Obama and Pelosi had laid for him: instead of keeping his eye on the ball — freedom of religion — he bought into the Obama narrative that this is all about contraception and access thereto. Rush screwed up and is going to be paying a big price. He let the rest of us down too.


128 posted on 03/03/2012 1:09:46 PM PST by Romulus (The Traditional Latin Mass is the real Youth Mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanGreen2008; Mr Rogers
Rewriting one of my sentences in post 107, changing "is" to "are."

In essence, those lacking said tolerance are much like Islamists who would execute (stoning or head removal) an Islamic woman for driving a car.

Also ... adding to my post 107 comment on intolerance ...

One major lesson I've learned from life is that intolerance backed by religious precepts can be drastically wrong; especially in precepts involving science and sex.

129 posted on 03/04/2012 9:47:19 AM PST by OldNavyVet (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet; MeanGreen2008

“One major lesson I’ve learned from life is that intolerance backed by religious precepts can be drastically wrong; especially in precepts involving science and sex.”

Intolerance of evil is virtue.

And rampant sex outside of marriage is NOT good for the USA. Neither is PAYING women to have sex good for the USA, nor having large numbers of women who think they are ENTITLED to being paid for their sexual activities...


130 posted on 03/04/2012 11:54:13 AM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Intolerance of evil is virtue.

Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics, in Human areas involving pleasure and pain, defines Licentiousness as an excess vice, Temperance as a virtue, and Insensibility as a deficiency vice.

In other spheres of human activity, Aristotle's remaining Virtues are ... Courage, Liberality, Magnificence, Magnanimity, Proper Ambition, Patience, Truthfulness, Wittiness, Friendliness, Modesty, and Righteous Indignition.

Regarding Aristotle's remaining Vices, let's call them recommended reading.

131 posted on 03/04/2012 1:08:45 PM PST by OldNavyVet (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

I’ll choose God over Aristotle for defining good & evil.

That does NOT mean we are not ALL sinners. But sin - evil - is to be repented of, not accepted or praised. Roughly half of all births are now out-of-wedlock. That is not good for our society, and the trend is not our friend.


132 posted on 03/04/2012 2:05:49 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson