To: napscoordinator
So you don’t find this just a little misleading?
4 posted on
03/02/2012 2:46:15 PM PST by
Toespi
To: Toespi
So you dont find this just a little misleading?
This ad ran in MI and all of the parties said nothing to distance themselves from it. As a matter of fact, they all still continue to support him to some degree. If you want to talk about misleading, lets chat about the Mittens negative Super PAC ads that he has been running against Newt and Rick.
12 posted on
03/02/2012 2:57:19 PM PST by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Toespi
.
I have a "nurturing" Theory about Rush's "slut" remarks ...
First, of course, he's correct ... any Woman in any office, bar, church, etc ... who said that she needs $ 3,000 annually to supoort her (unmarried) sexual addiction ...
is accurately called a "slut" ...
However ... there's a chance that Rush deliberately brought the "gasoline AND the matches" and escalated this to a Nuclear DefCon-1 level ...
WHY ?
Perhaps to take the National attention from the Super Tuesday primaries ... Newt's possible strategic gains ... Santorum's lost status ... and Romney's embarrassment ...
After all ... Super Tuesday is already "page six" news for the next week ...
"Just a theory ... that happens to fit the facts ..."
Spock, Star Trek VI, "The Undiscovered Country" ...
.
65 posted on
03/02/2012 6:42:46 PM PST by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson