“altered” really...
Altered might be we air brushed some anomalies...
Several LE experts have testified both in court and in public press events that the documents are forgeries.
How much crack do you actually smoke?
Way to go. Go for the insult right away. It's right up there with calling anyone that questions the authenticity a racist, and it's a super way win fence sitters over to your side.
Here's the deal. IF we are talking about the originally posted document. It has been altered. It is different than the version handed out by the WH at the presser at the same time. We know this because the (iirc) AP posted a high res copy online.
What decisively proves the WH version was altered is the duplicate characters. There are numerous duplications on a document of comparatively low character count. The odds of which happening are so astronomically high, only the most topically ignorant bias apologist, would attempt to counter with explanation.
This does not prove it's forged. It may in fact be a manipulated authentic document.
For the record, I dove into this head first. I read every blog that got posted here and every thread, because I have been in the printing industry for the past 30 years and know much about processing "camera ready" art. Which means I've spent millions of hours looking at type and glyphs through a loop, or on a HD screen. So far I haven't found any of the OCR/Acrobat/PDF processing anomaly explanations compelling.
Now excuse me, I must get back to my crack pipe.