Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Sordo

Lee was the local registrar for the same hospital in which Virginia Sunahara was born. Think about it.

DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS

Aside from the fact that Obama’s ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health appears to be affixed with a signature which appears to play on the Hawaiian word, “UKULELE” (U.K.L. Lee), it is also represented by different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each of the four branch offices in which births were registered in Hawaii. Obama’s birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.

The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.

OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.

Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.

Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.

This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.

An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.

The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers...etc etc

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/out-of-order-obamas-non-sequential.html


44 posted on 03/04/2012 5:23:59 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

I read your Nat. Rev. article, and of course it’s BS, like everything else you post. Here, as an example, is some of the comments at that bottom of the ridiculous screed...

UTTERLY RIDICULOUS! The explanation in this article is ludicrous! A document that is scanned - as a real birth certificate would be - would never generate layers in any software, least of all Illustrator. These are opposing file types. A scan is a bitmap (pixel-based) format, but Illustrator is a vector (EPS) based format. Scans have only one layer. Period! Additionally, any document scanned with an OCR (optical character recognition) software will only generate a text (txt, rtf, etc.) file and ignore all graphic content.

I am an award-winning graphic designer with 30+ years experience. I have been using both Illustrator and Photoshop since they were introduced in the 80’s. In fact I personally post-produced the first Illustrator88 instructional video as a sub-contractor to Mountain View-based Adobe Sys.

Whomever was in charge of the fabrication of this wanna-be birth certificate is a technical moron. Even my first year graphic students know how to uncheck the box that says “remain editable”. This “graphics” person should be fired and the White House should own up to this colossal deception!

As you can see, months after the article professionals have had time to examine and consider the facts, and they all can easily conclude that Obama is a fraud and his BC is a an OBVIOUS fake.


60 posted on 03/04/2012 9:37:59 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson