Posted on 03/05/2012 3:28:04 AM PST by MulberryDraw
Confirmed Obama's Birth Certificate Not Authentic 2012 !
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said President Barack Obama's birth certificate is not authentic.
Arpaio revealed the findings of a investigation into the president's birth certificate at a 1 hour and 20 minute news conference Thursday, calling the certificate "suspect."
Arpaio's team of investigators said they found that the long-form birth certificate was created electronically and never existed in paper form.
The president's Selective Service card was also questioned.
Arpaio's investigators claimed the document has "failed every test we put it through."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I am beginning to have some VERY SERIOUS doubts surround the recent, untimely death and timing of that death, of Brother Andrew Breitbart, Patriot (RIP). He was on to something and was about to blow the lid off it. There is a White House Plumbers squad, or something akin to it, and these are some serious people. We have really crossed the rubicon now, my friends.
Where is Donald Trump on this whole thing? Should not they align forces, and he work the Eastern Seaboard NYC/Boston/Washington D.C. TV and press circuit on this? Or maybe they want to wait a little bit more into the election cycle such as September, and get some court rulings.
Why? Because the media in this country is a far bigger threat then any politician could ever be.
The greater threat to our society is the ELECTORATE!..I am constantly amazed at the the lack of caring/comprehension by the vast majority of the citizens of our once great country. I mention “elegibility” to some of the guys I work with and I get the same look from them as I get from my dog when I attempt to teach him how to use a remote or cell phone..not a clue.
“How do we know the confirmation isnt a fake?”
**************************************************
To what “confirmation” are you referring? Sign me “mystified”.
Sorry, but I have to disagree! The Founders gave the Media powers granted to them under the constitution to keep the electorate informed. The problem is, they are failing in their responsibilities and thus they represent a much bigger threat then the politicians currently in office. If more people were kept up to date on what was going on in Washington, this administration would have an approval rating around 2%.
As long the the media continues to whitewash, cover up, and flat out lie about the misdeeds of our elected officials, then it's hard to make an informed and intelligent decision on who to vote for.
********
The pencil number "9" next to the item "African": In a recent report on the internet, researchers claim that the number "9" was placed there by a clerk at the Hawaii health department for statistical purposes required by United States vital records laws, and it was not put there by someone at the hospital.
According to the researchers, the number "1" referred to Caucasian, while the number "9" referred to "Not Stated."
(For instance, the number "1" is correct next to Obama's mother's name and next to the Nordyke twins' mother's and father's names, because we would expect the term "Caucasian" to be typed in their "race" space, because we know that the two mothers were Caucasian.)
The researchers wondered why the number "9" (Not Stated) was penciled in when the word "African" is obviously there, and when the category of "non-white" was a possible choice for the clerk when he examined Obama's birth certificate and penciled in "9" for "Not Stated."
So why did the Hawaii government clerk put a "9" (Not Stated) next to the word "African", when the clerk had several other choices from the race menu such as "non-white" to choose from?
Did the clerk make an honest mistake and pencil in "9" when he meant to pencil in another number?
Or, could the answer be a simple one: The space was originally blank.
So the forger typed in or photshopped in the word "African" so that the term "African" in the "race" space in the long form birth certificate released in April 2011 would be the same as the term "African" that we see on Obama's short form birth certificate that was released by Obama to the public back during the 2008 campaign?
Whatever proof (confirmation) they’ve used to determine the bc is fake.
Yep. We are at war with the media. Newt has the right idea in exposing them.
Unless I’m mistaken, I believe this is an “AZ” CBS broadcast, which would explain “fair” coverage. Very little coverage in other states, unfortunately. Also, it seems just TOO ironic that Breibart’s death would occur THE NIGHT BEFORE he was to release damaging videos of Obama’s college years. What are the chances of a 43 year old dying of a “natural causes” at a crucial time like this ????? VERY suspicious !
I believe your right. All we've ever gotten is LOTS of BARKING... but NO ONE BITES!
Ever since the 2008 presidential campaign, people have been debating over and over whether or not it was easy for non-citizens to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate way back in 1961, the year that is on Obama's long form birth certificate released to the public in April 2011.
Recently, Feb.2012, researchers at the Daily Pen site studied the Resident births and the non-Resident births in Hawaii in 1961.
They also compared Hawaii's births to other states that had 20,000 or less births during 1961, the year that Obama claims was his birth year in Hawaii.
The following comparison table is from the researchers at Daily Pen:
1961 United States births -----States with 20,000 or less births:
(I hope that you can follow the statistics in the table. I had a difficult time fitting the table in this message space.)
Residents Non-Residents Non-Resident percentage
Alaska 7502 568 7.57%
Delaware 11,876 976 8.22%
Idaho 16,736 3,218 19.23%
Montana 17,196 2,374 13.81%
Nevada 8,092 658 8.13%
New Hampshire 13,426 2,176 16.21%
Rhode Island 19,330 3,788 19.60%
South Dakota 17,530 5,438 31.02%
Vermont 9,166 1,506 16.43%
Wyoming 8,446 794 9.40%
HAWAII 17,578 70 0.40%
1. Look at Hawaii statistics for 1961: Only 70 births were labeled as being non-resident births, and the percentage of such births were only 0.40% of those 17,578 births.
2. How does Hawaii compare to other states in 1961?
3. Montana, for instance, had almost the same number of births as Hawaii at 17,196, but it also had 2,176 non-Resident births, and those non-resident births were 13.81% of all births.
4. Other states on the list when compared to Hawaii show a lot more non-resident births than Hawaii, the gateway to the United States for many Asian immigrants in 1961 and today, yet Hawaii says that only 70 non-residents were listed as being born in Hawaii in 1961. How is that possible?
5. I don't know about you, but the statistics above---if accurate---proves to me that Hawaii was very lax in 1961 when it handed out birth certificates.
6. That is, it seems that Hawaii in 1961 handed out birth certificates to anyone who claimed to be a resident of Hawaii without first going out and checking to see if the claim of residency was true or a fraud.
7. It other words, it seems that Hawaii had a no-questions asked policy when it came to handing out original birth certificates to anyone who applied for one.
8. Is it possible, then, that Obama's mother and grandmother took advantage of Hawaii's lax birth certificate rules when they obtained a Hawaii United States birth certificate for infant Obama, because Obama was not really born in Hawaii as he claims?
Corsi has indictated that next week the Sheriff will have another press conference to share more information.
This is getting hot.
Forward to the shock!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.