Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum: The Republican Obama
Capitalism Magazine ^ | March 5, 2012 | Michael J. Hurd

Posted on 03/05/2012 4:51:35 PM PST by Misterioso

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2012 4:51:37 PM PST by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

I beg to differ, it is Romney who is the Republican “O”. Heck, he’s barely Republican at all. I never got the sense that Rick Santorum had any 0-like characteristics.


2 posted on 03/05/2012 4:53:34 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

“...freedom as specified in the U.S. Constitution is not absolute, and that government policy must take a position on birth control, abortion, and private activities by consenting adults if the government deems them immoral...”

He actually SAID that? That’s something the libs should have jumped-on, but I didn’t hear about it. I’m surprised Mark Levin hasn’t brought that up yet.


3 posted on 03/05/2012 4:55:55 PM PST by Carriage Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
Most of these social conservatives who support Santorum have no problem with government regulating things they consider immoral.

What a steaming pile of crap. I couldn't care less what turd burglars do as long as I don't have to see it, fund it, or deal with the consequences of it. The same can be said for virtually all of the social issues.
4 posted on 03/05/2012 4:57:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

The trashiest BS article on FR in a long time. Should be taken off.


5 posted on 03/05/2012 4:57:27 PM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; admin

Agree “naps.” This is total bull dressed up to look cerebral. Seems like Zot bait to me.


6 posted on 03/05/2012 5:03:50 PM PST by Frank Sheed (This tagline space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

Heard Santorum on the radio today on Hannity and he just got really tiresome to listen to....like an ankle biter yap yap yapping... On and on..and on.

If he gets the nomination then I’ll vote for him but it will be an anti-Obama vote, not a pro-Santorum vote.

With the communists taking over the media I wonder if we’ll ever get a really good candidate again.


7 posted on 03/05/2012 5:04:59 PM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
“Fundamentalists believe that fun and happiness should be limited by government — not just when they get in the way of somebody’s legitimate rights to be free from force or fraud, but even when they don’t.”

The use of the word fundamentalist to describe people of faith and spirituality is a sure sign you are dealing with someone who is anti-Christian and probably a leftist trying to pretend to be a Conservative.

Does the author think that killing innocent unborn children is “fun and happiness”? The the author believe that lying, violent crime and attacks on religion are “fun and happiness”? Does the author believe that running up trillions of dollars in debt to provide money to the politically connected is “fun and happiness”? Do he believe that the drug cartels and armed thugs that prey on law abiding citizens provide “fun and happiness”?

I am sick and tired of these false narratives and the dishonest attacks on people with moral values and principles.

8 posted on 03/05/2012 5:05:02 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You are right. The Constitution was not meant to be absolute in the sense used in the article. The Constitution was intended to limit the federal government’s powers to those expressly enumerated. The states were and are entitled to legislate on all but that very narrow set of issues.


9 posted on 03/05/2012 5:06:26 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madison10

You need to give examples....this guy (the author ) did and he makes a good case


10 posted on 03/05/2012 5:08:40 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
This is getting ridiculous. The anti-Santorum posters have sunk to deeper and deeper depths.

Most of these social conservatives who support Santorum have no problem with government regulating things they consider immoral.

This is true of practically every person in the country, including the author of this article and the person who posted it. We regulate how many items one can take out of a store without paying for them. (Hint: zero) We put people in prison everyday for doing things that we consider immoral.

The anti-Santorum mania is verging on psychosis.
11 posted on 03/05/2012 5:08:40 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

There’s a word for Republicans who either ignore, or timidly stay away from social issues: RINOs.


12 posted on 03/05/2012 5:09:09 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
it is Romney who is the Republican “O”.

Can't be, Romney is severely conservative.

Photobucket

13 posted on 03/05/2012 5:10:53 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You said...
“turd burglars”

LOL!!!


14 posted on 03/05/2012 5:13:22 PM PST by LMAO ("Begging hands and Bleeding hearts will only cry out for more"...Anthem from Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
“Santorum, and the people he represents, are sick puppies. They cannot stand the idea that anyone is having sex in a context or manner which they personally find offensive or disgusting”

This is the stupidest thing I have read in a while. Conservatives literally don't care what others do in private. It is when they demand my money to fund their disease spreading health care needs and their uncared for children and their drug treatment and their general refusal to take responsibility for anything or contribute anything to society.

If someone promises never to steal my money they can do whatever they want. But it never works like that. They are irresponsible and talk about their right to be decadent. Then they expect me to fund the consequences of what they do.

15 posted on 03/05/2012 5:13:31 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Rick has a few O like qualities, but I’ll admit, this piece is over the top. Don’t care for RS much, but he’s not our “Obama.”


16 posted on 03/05/2012 5:14:48 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso

No, freedom is not absolute. You are not free to kill, steal, rape, or enslave your neighbors. Therefore, you are not free to abort your neighbors.

To argue that absolute freedom to do whatever the hell you want is “conservative” is nonsense. Libertarian, maybe.

And as we have already seen, once a sufficiently large number of citizens of any country refuse to discipline or govern themselves, then you are in the Land of Hobbes, and there will soon be a dictator and a police force to MAKE you do what they want.

It’s either self discipline or discipline from above—i.e., dictatorship.


17 posted on 03/05/2012 5:16:10 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
There’s a word for Republicans who either ignore, or timidly stay away from social issues: RINOs.

You can't honestly separate social from fiscal conservatism no matter how hard some try.

My former GOP congressman claimed to be a fiscal conservative but called pro lifers extreme. However, his fiscal conservatism included taxpayer funding of things like abortion under the label of choice.
18 posted on 03/05/2012 5:16:52 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: detective

Actually, RS has made numerous statements in his political career about sex being for procreation only. Now, while he has never indicated he would govern with that as an issue, he has stated it, and thus the article is not totally off base in bringing it up.

Not totally in correct context either.


19 posted on 03/05/2012 5:18:10 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
He actually SAID that?

No, just another paraphrased POS. Goodman is referring to Santorum's recent and past comments that freedom as specified in the U.S. Constitution is not absolute, and that government policy must take a position on birth control, abortion, and private activities by consenting adults if the government deems them immoral.

20 posted on 03/05/2012 5:19:04 PM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson