So in the primaries we should go with a sweater-vest panty-waist social conservative (a la Huckabee) or a heretic? (If he’s that wrong about the Bible what else is he missing?)
Churchill was a similar anti-choice, but he proved worthy when the test came...
“Churchill was a similar anti-choice, but he proved worthy when the test came...”
Actually Churchill had popular support, which Gingrich does not have.
What is so hard for you Newt supporters to understand? He tried, he failed.
Do we really have to suffer through conspiracy theories and Churchillian analogies to justify Newt staying in the race when he has minimal support?