Yes. Mine differ because in some of the states where they have not allocated committed delegates yet, I have projected them based on the votes in the counties and districts. As soon as those numbers firm up, I update my chart to agree.
So, my chart contains all of the hard allocated ones, plus the others I project, but that will be firmly allocated as soon as the local, state boards announce all of their numbers. When they do, I update my chart to the hard numbers.
Nice site that.
You know what is funniest of all. Everywhere I go that shows delegate numbers are different. Every last place. So if these so called experts are getting the delegate numbers wrong, how can it possibly be a fair system or maybe that is what they want. I say give each state a delegate count and make them winner takes all and that way this crazy delegate cheating system will not be available. I still think it is dumb for a 2nd or 3rd place finisher to get delegates. Why? I mean it is like in youth sports where the loser gets a trophy too since they don't want that team to feel bad. The dumbing down of America continues even when running for President. Why not keep the electoral college and the first person to get to 270 electorates get the nomination?