That was a stoner’s post.
Even Western Civilization has known about the use of marijuana “taking place” for thousands of years, we just didn’t indulge, and we condemned it. Fringes and dregs of Western culture have been indulging in such drugs since ancient times, it just never entered the mainstream until recently.
As far as homosexual “marriage”, in America we have had both religious, and civil marriage for centuries, we never needed to address making laws against this homosexual agenda, until recently.
Probably true in most cases - but how does your claim "Not re-legalise" follow from that?
75 years or so a law was passed because a problem was growing among American youth, it was reaching into the mainstream youth and it finally had to be addressed,
If you're referring to the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, it's very much open to debate that there was in fact a "problem" rather than simply Reefer Madness hysteria. We can agree that marijuana was in fact being used and was known to be in use.
You still haven't answered the most important question: How does your claim "Not re-legalise" follow from that?
*STILL* no answer to this simple question.
Any action is legal before a law against it is passed.
I don't know that homosexual marriage was legal before it is made illegal.
Bad example - civil marriage is an act of government, and as such no kind of civil marriage (homosexual, polygamous, whatever) is legal unless and until government says so. The use of marijuana, which was/is an act of individuals rather than government, certainly was legal until government said otherwise.
Even Western Civilization has known about the use of marijuana “taking place” for thousands of years,
So we agree on that point.
we just didn’t indulge, and we condemned it.
Yet there were no laws against it, so it was by definition legal.
Fringes and dregs of Western culture have been indulging in such drugs since ancient times, it just never entered the mainstream until recently.
As far as homosexual “marriage”, in America we have had both religious, and civil marriage for centuries, we never needed to address making laws against this homosexual agenda, until recently.
We still haven't passed any laws AGAINST homosexual marriage (although we have passed laws against state courts forcing it on states, and against states being forced to recognize other states' homosexual marriages). As I said, no kind of civil marriage is legal unless and until government says so.