Replies

The only way you can can come up with $3000 over 3 years is through multiple abortions.

So, what is Ms Fluke’s ultimate motive in:
1. attending Georgetown U, a Catholic institution
2. trying to change their birth control policy
3. pushing to give testimony before the subcommittee?

I believe the answer is that she, and her like-minded cohorts, want to force the Catholic Church to fund abortions.

Fluke's speech was carefully written. Fluke didn't say contraception costs $3,000 during law school. Fluke said:

"Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school."

Then Fluke went on to talk about contraception that was needed for medical reasons. You and I know that some contraceptives - not available in generic form - are used for certain medical reasons. Those aren't the ones that are available for $9/month or $15/month.

This whole thing was carefully written and staged. First, we screamed the $3,000/year was wrong (some us said read what she said - she said during law school, that's over $1,000 per year. Now, we're screaming contraception is available for under $1,000 a year. Yes, but she set us up. She said it can cost over $1,000 per year and gave examples of contraceptives needed for medical reasons. I'll wager generic contraceptives aren't going to work on all those cases and that Fluke is technically right. Some pro helped her write what she said.