Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
"The public performance of Rush's music is not licensed for political purposes and any such use is in breach of public performance licenses and constitutes copyright infringement," reads the statement.

They can ask real nice... But there is no legal requirement that Rush comply, in spite of their assertion here.

24 posted on 03/08/2012 6:49:14 AM PST by Haiku Guy ("The problem with Internet Quotes is that you never know if they are real" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Haiku Guy

What’s more, the SCOTUS (in that infamous Jerry Falwell in the Outhouse case involving Larry Flynt) has granted absolute protection to parody.

So if Rush won’t let Rush play their song, he is perfectly free to hand it over to Paul Shanklin to produce a snot-ripping parody of it.


43 posted on 03/08/2012 7:24:35 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson