I didn’t find the “ethicists” arguments outrageous ... at least no more outrageous than the current law-of-the-land.
I disagree with the premise that abortion is ethical. But, given that premise, their logic is sound. I find no moral distinction between a gestating baby, and a born baby. If one can be terminated because it is unable to survive outside the womb, then I don’t see why the other can’t be terminated because it is unable to survive unassisted in the world. If no mother should be forced to birth an unwanted child ... why should one be forced to nurture and raise an unwanted child?
This is merely the logical end of the pro-abortion argument. The pro-life movement is better off with this argument out there. Make the pro-aborters defend it.
SnakeDoc
I agree with you, SnakeDoctor. The more the Death Eaters present their “ethical” argument for infanticide, the more opportunity humans have to explain that this is the exact same “ethics” that underpins pre-natal infanticide as well.