Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s Wrong with the Conservative Movement?
Townhall.com ^ | March 11, 2012 | Derek Hunter

Posted on 03/11/2012 5:35:32 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: JediJones

morality vs. civil constitutionally guaranteed rights... you have the right to life (common sense here, not an issue of morality) liberty (see the bill of rights for those liberties guaranteed you) and the pursuit of happiness (that can and does include the items you work for and purchase)... murder, rape and theivery are not moral issues, they are civil rights issues.... you must have the ability to separate the two... give it a try (it is difficult to do)


61 posted on 03/12/2012 4:17:12 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Very good comment, thanks for posting.

Madison foresaw the problem of faction and lost a lot of sleep over it, and John Calhoun after him. Both were admirers of the "gentleman legislator" ideal of the 18th century, and both were long-lived enough to be disappointed to see the rise of the Albany Regency, Tammany Hall, and the Millocracy.

Nobody yet has found a solution for the "two-party problem", viz., the tendency of every issue to be coopted successfully by one of the two "established" parties. That's why the Bull Moosers failed in 1912, and why there hasn't been room for a new party in American politics since 1856, the year after the Whig Party finally came apart. But the Whigs only took 16 years to die, whereas the Republicans have been hanging around, their usefulness pretty well shot, since 1932, to serve mostly as a punching bag for the closet Stalinists who took over the Democratic Party.

62 posted on 03/12/2012 5:33:13 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
smoot-hawley

We've debunked that myth so many times on Free Republic. You need better than that...

63 posted on 03/12/2012 5:40:04 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
All the "Bull Moose" Party managed to do was to get Wilson, a real left-wing SOB, elected.

Comparison time:
the by now universally despised Harding was actually a much better leader than the present Kenyan recumbent ... especially economically!

Harding got handed a genuine recession ... and his administration solved the problem in 18 months! The "Teapot Dome" scandal? Peanuts! BTW, gasoline was $0.19/gallon. No high-test!

64 posted on 03/12/2012 6:00:37 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: central_va

no myth.... not debunked....i have done my research on this subject


65 posted on 03/12/2012 6:41:02 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
Ok for the 15th million time, smoot hawley couldn't of had a devastating effect on the US economy in 1932. Why? Because we were a self sufficient country then and import-exports were on 4.2% of the economy. Even if ALL trade stopped 4.2 % is not going to cause a great depression.

Imports during 1929 were only 4.2% of the United States' GNP and exports were only 5.0%. Monetarists, such as Milton Friedman, who emphasize the central role of the money supply in causing the depression, note that the Smoot-Hawley Act only had a contributory effect on the entire U.S. economy

66 posted on 03/12/2012 6:57:31 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; lilycicero; MaryLou1; glock rocks; JPG; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; pieces of time; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


67 posted on 03/12/2012 6:59:50 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
Like Newt said, we are at a crossroads.

“The wild worship of lawlessness and the materialist worship of law end in the same void. Nietzsche scales staggering mountains, but he turns up ultimately in Tibet. He sits down beside Tolstoy in the land of nothing and Nirvana. They are both helpless—one because he must not grasp anything, and the other because he must not let go of anything. The Tolstoyan’s will is frozen by a Buddhist instinct that all special actions are evil. But the Nietzscheite’s will is quite equally frozen by his view that all special actions are good; for if all special actions are good, none of them are special. They stand at the crossroads, and one hates all the roads and the other likes all the roads. The result is—well, some things are not hard to calculate. They stand at the cross-roads.”

― G.K. Chesterton


68 posted on 03/12/2012 7:06:29 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Si vis pacem, para bellum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What’s Wrong with the Conservative Movement?

There are a number of important answers to that question, but I'll just point out the most important one:

Constant compromise of principles that should never be compromised.

69 posted on 03/12/2012 7:39:43 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Si vis pacem, para bellum.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We don’t see a conservative message put across on the national debate because the so-called conservatives are themselves afraid of it. So long as the GOP establishment thinks elections are won by fielding centrist after centrist how can anyone expect them to all of a sudden deliver a conservative message? With what brain are they going to do that? The same that endorses Romney?


70 posted on 03/12/2012 5:14:23 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson