We thoroughly disagree.
But you will fall for anything that has Newt as the villain.
You will not see anything else even if it is right before your eyes and all mathematics and logic were to point to its truth. Such as the point being made by utmost certainty that Santorum CANNOT WIN THE NOMINATION OVER ROMNEY BY DELEGATE MATH, NEWT OR NO NEWT.
And I will add, Newt was the frontrunner and Santorum was at 4 per cent, when Romney destroyed Newt in Iowa with five million in negative ads against a man with almost no money, and later in FL with twenty million in such ads.
While leaving Santorum alone in the ad attacks.
Then Santorum walked into that breach and became what he has become.
As the religion candidate in the Republican party.
Which in no way equals what is needed to win a national race against all the odds arrayed.
Oh, but Santorum and his supporters aren’t selfish, oh never, that would only go to Newt and his supporters.
Your Newt fixation dooms your thoughts, and it guarantees you will distort the view of fellow freepers and miss every key point of truth that doesn’t account for Newt the villain.
Good luck with that.
You might need it.
“But you will fall for anything that has Newt as the villain.”
Maybe Newt IS the villain?
As you point out - Santorum doesn’t get over the top with or without Newt - which is why I believe that Newt is such a villain, such an egotist that he will throw his support to Romney to advance himself.
Would you not agree that would be a villainous act?
You simply cannot rule it out with Newt - no matter how much you’d like to say that THIS time he stands on principle.