Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

The point is we could reduce our overall energy consumption from petroleum if we want to make ourselves overall less dependent on petroleum. So 36% could go down to say 25%, just as an example. IF the issue is being more energy independent, there are multiple strategies we could use to do that, including upping our percentage of overall energy from nuclear ... but only if that is our goal.

It seems not to be our goal.


51 posted on 03/15/2012 10:30:18 AM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

So 36% could go down to say 25%, just as an example.

That is what I am asking for, an example. What is the new Nuclear plant going to replace. It is not going to replace transportation. It is not going to replace industrial feedstock. How does more electrical energy generated from nuclear power reduce oil consumption?


53 posted on 03/15/2012 11:22:45 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson