Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
The whole "readmission" business was bizarre--Lincoln rejected the notion that states could secede and reconquered the South to make his point, but once the South was defeated the Radical Republicans said the Confederate States had seceded and had to be "readmitted." Congress could prevent Senators and Representatives from taking their seats until they approved, but when Southern states got their seats back in the Senate the clock had kept ticking as if nothing had happened as far as which Senate seats were up in each two-year election cycle.

I haven't looked at what was said when Texas was "readmitted," but I once saw a doctoral study of various proposals to divide Texas into five states, and they went on long after 1865.

33 posted on 03/16/2012 6:01:04 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

If secession were illegal then technically no state seceded. And no state may form another state within it’s own boundaries. Using this reasoning the entire state of West Virginia is illegal and Virginia would be within the law to take it back. Does that sound correct?


34 posted on 03/17/2012 6:42:15 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Just because someone thinks it's a good idea doesn't make it legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson