Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryan24

I would say flat 10%, but otherwise agree.


11 posted on 03/19/2012 5:24:58 PM PDT by jkeith3213
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: jkeith3213

Now, my 9-9-9 plan...


13 posted on 03/19/2012 6:30:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: jkeith3213

Newt’s “mind boggling” tax plan features an optional 15% individual flat tax after deductions and a 12.5% corporate rate. Also phases out social security and medicare. Returns welfare functions to the states and the people per the constitution.

And will actually gut the bloated federal government:

http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/12/news/economy/newt_gingrich_taxes/index.htm

Romney (Obama-lite) will tinker around the edges, but actually raise taxes on the “wealthy.” Will not reduce government.

Santorum likes the 28% top rate. Says if it was good enough for Reagan, it’s good enough for him. Will tinker but not drastically reduce government. Will continue funding the monster at current rates.

I’ll take Newt’s plan please.


14 posted on 03/19/2012 6:43:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is not just brewing, rebellion is here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson