“Really? Why do so many people comment about things without bothering to read what they are commenting about?”
OK, first he reports on what Mrs Ayers said. That is second hand. Then he claims to meet a man who he says is the same person revealed to him by Mrs Ayers, but we do not know if it is the same person.
And why would Mrs Ayers be having such a conversation with the mailman? It seems too perfect for a story like this.
“Yep, I was the Ayers mailman and you know what? They revealed that they were grooming the future president! Then I saw a young black man you looked just like Obama AND he told me he would be president.” Yeah, right. This sounds like an urban myth.
Memory is mailable and this took place in 1989. He could have imagined a lot of the detail, like that the man said his goal was to be president. That sounds like an embellishment.
And again, WHY would Obama — if it was him — be talking to the mailman? That’s convenient (for this story).
He could be making this stuff up based on faulty memory. This remark make me think he isn’t really clear about details himself:
“And I believe she said he was from either Kenya or Indonesia, and I favor Indonesia in my recollection.”
What Mrs. Ayers said is second hand Mr. Huston's testimony that she told him that is first hand.
Then he claims to meet a man who he says is the same person revealed to him by Mrs Ayers, but we do not know if it is the same person.
How many young men do you think they personally helped through college in that one year's time? It all comes down to who you want to believe; Mr. Huston or 0bama.
For the record; that is entirely your twisted paraphrasing of Mr. Huston's words. He signed an affadavit saying that he is 100% sure that the young man he talked to was Barack 0bama and said exactly that on video.
Well, he's a mailman so his memory should be mailable. /s lol
maleable.