Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

As I said, simply touching another person would be considered assault. Zimmerman didn’t have to throw a punch or anything to be considered at fault.

As I said, if a random person, who does not identify himself, comes up to me and even touches me on the shoulder and asking questions, seemingly without reason, I am going to be concerned for my safety as there would be no reason for anybody else to be doing that. as far as I know in that situation.

If I tried to walk away and that person tries to stop me, as far as I know, because I don’t know who this guy is, my life is in danger and I am going to act under that assumption.


179 posted on 03/21/2012 9:53:08 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30; marktwain
As I said, simply touching another person would be considered assault. Zimmerman didn’t have to throw a punch or anything to be considered at fault. Beyond that, Zimmerman could have lost his "self-defense" argument under Florida law even if he didn't initiate physical contact. First, because Assault is defined under Florida law as "unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent." You can commit assault without making physical contact. Also, as I mentioned above, you can lose your "self-defense" defense even if you don't commit a crime, if you "provoke" the use of force against yourself.
181 posted on 03/21/2012 10:13:25 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30; marktwain
As I said, simply touching another person would be considered assault. Zimmerman didn’t have to throw a punch or anything to be considered at fault.

Let's try that again:

Beyond that, Zimmerman could have lost his "self-defense" argument under Florida law even if he didn't initiate physical contact. First, because Assault is defined under Florida law as "unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent." You can commit assault without making physical contact.

Also, as I mentioned above, you can lose your "self-defense" defense even if you don't commit a crime, if you "provoke" the use of force against yourself.

184 posted on 03/21/2012 10:20:14 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson