Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37
If the thug responded to someone following and approaching him by smashing his face, taking him down, mounting him and then slamming his head into concrete, then he got what he deserved.

We dont know exactly how it happened, we dont know how he approached him, we dont know who made the first move, once the fight starts, all bets are off, however. We DO know that Zimmerman was following him, against recommendations. For that, I fault Zimmerman. Like I said, it might not be a crime, but Zim is at least at fault for starting the whole thing.

And I've been followed too, it ended up pretty ugly. I'm glad the other guy didnt have a gun.

57 posted on 03/22/2012 5:29:38 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Paradox

I’m sorry, but following and approcahing someone is not assault, and it is not aggrvated assault.

The kid could have used his phone to call police and report the following.

If he chose to assault Zimmerman over it, then Zimmerman was within the law to use his gun to stop the assault.

You are exactly right when you say what Zimmerman did wasn’t a crime, and if what the kid apparently did happened, then that was a violent crime.


59 posted on 03/22/2012 9:04:27 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

Is it a crime or is it against any ordiance for a person or a neighorhood watch captain to follow a suspicious individual?

Please cite for me the anti-following ordiance that he was in violation of.


63 posted on 03/22/2012 3:14:17 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson