Posted on 03/22/2012 8:24:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
“Birthers do not uphold the US Constitution. They distort it, and then demonize the very institutions they pretend to defend when those institutions explain how birthers are wrong. They are quite Anti-American.”
That is low, even for an anti-birther. There are rational attacks/accusations, and there are lunatic attacks/accusations. Some of the most red-blooded conservative patriots I’ve ever met are ‘birthers’. They love this country and its Constitution, and many have served honorably and self-sacrificially in the military. How dare you label them anti-American? Perhaps you forgot for a moment you’re not on fogbow, where such comments are commonplace and are uncritically accepted as true.
"That is low, even for an anti-birther."
It's not just low. It is in fact outrageous. I gave seven years of my life on active duty, including a war, in service to this country, and I'm going to be called Anti-American in this forum? Un freaking believable.
Thanks for the ping, bd. I think.
Thank you, F_J, for your service. It is profoundly appreciated and honored.
It appears we have a new standard for patriotism: agree w mlo, or onto the ‘anti-American’ trash heap you go.
That’s really interesting. According to mlo’s definition, Barack Hussein Obama is the most pro-American/strongest upholder of the Constitution on the planet.
Hmmm.
Do not care about who endorses who, I’m still not voting for Romney because he will lose. Come on people! Romney is a plastic cartoon character,not a presidential nominee.
It’s a troll. Sign up date means nothing.
For a year, mlo has posted on FR only on the BC threads and has posted a pic of the factcheck BC dozens of times. He was MIA on FR except for a handful of posts from 2004-2006-2007. Sign up date means nothing. He returns to FR for elections of when he needs to post his DNC talking points.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?brevity=full;tab=comments
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=65294002
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=65178548
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=64861438
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=60335667
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=60060091
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=59791473
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=59653672
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:mlo/index?more=59503263
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/634790/posts?page=38#38
Yes, mlo is from that other party.
And who happens to be on that super duper troll ping list. Gee, who do we see listed first? mlo...
You bring up one of my great fears:
I.E., it is we who possibly supply DNC talking points. E.G., Bill Maher's stuff is sometimes perfect counterpoint; too bloody perfect.
So he must be good people, y’all! ;-)
Thumb suckers all, if they think they wont get their way they get upset.There are only two potentials VP’s with charisma, Marco or Sarah.
MItt is not a NBC nor is Marco.
For that matter neither is the dear leader.
If its OK for the dear leader to be allowed to hold the office of potus than it OK for Mitt or Marco.
Conservatives are tired of the double standard it has to end somewhere. If zero wants to resign and we will void everything he has done for the past three plus years than neither Marco Romney nor Santo can run, that's fine. We just need a level playing field that's all.
I agree this guy is a well know PITA!
FYI: Rubio leading the Hispandering Dream Act for the GOP’s Romney campaign. http://www.vdare.com/posts/hispandering-alert-rubio-designated-flip-flop-leader
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.