Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
-- Please explain, in detail, why the legal consideration of a self-serving statement in criminal proceedings does not apply. --

Which statements of Zimmerman are you referring to?

FWIW, I don't think any of his statements would be struck as self-serving. His recorded marks before the physical altercation can't be statements of self-interest, in the meaning of the Williamson case.

379 posted on 03/25/2012 12:21:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

His (or any potential suspect’s) statement that the guy he shot attacked him would be considered self-serving unless it were to be corroborated by a neutral witness or evidence such as a condo-complex security camera. That’s just the way the law works.


382 posted on 03/25/2012 12:34:28 PM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson