Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2012 9:55:03 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: mnehring

But ... who will be Romney’s stalking horse?


2 posted on 03/28/2012 9:56:07 AM PDT by MatD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Mitt Doesn’t need him any more.


3 posted on 03/28/2012 9:56:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
I’m sure a big share of the fanatics that make up Ron Paul’s deeply committed grass roots base still think Paul can win the presidency.

It's true.

Practically all they talk about down at the methadone clinic.

4 posted on 03/28/2012 9:58:21 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

“Yes, he “won” the popular vote in the Virgin Islands earlier this month, but all but one of the eight delegates in that race ended up choosing Team Romney.”

I’m no Ron Paul fan but this illustrates part of what is wrong with the system.


5 posted on 03/28/2012 9:59:20 AM PDT by ConservativeTeen (Proud Right Wing Extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Where will his votes go? I really don’t see the Paulites choosing any of the three (really two) remaining candidates.


6 posted on 03/28/2012 9:59:46 AM PDT by MichaelNewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
As much as I dislike Paul, I don't see anything in this column to support the definitive nature of the headline.

RuPaul stayed in the race last time around until mid-June. I figure he'll do the same this time, because there are still Paultard pockets that can be picked.

7 posted on 03/28/2012 10:00:24 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

The title is misleading; this is speculation. “Ron Paul” and “will” should have been flipped.

That said, I’m not sure I agree with this article’s premise. If he’s still going while being this far behind, why would he drop out?


8 posted on 03/28/2012 10:01:17 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Which raises question of how much of an idiot he was to drop out of the pre-Super Tuesday CNN debate. Why would a cash-strapped candidate sinking in the polls turn down the free media? Unless, of course, you believe he already has a deal with Romney and was giving him cover because Romney wanted to drop out. The debates have been a much better model for letting us get to know the candidates than the advertising. Ever since the debates stopped, the candidates with less money have sunk in the polls. Which means we’re stuck with a purely pay-to-play democracy.


9 posted on 03/28/2012 10:01:32 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
Yes, he “won” the popular vote in the Virgin Islands earlier this month, but all but one of the eight delegates in that race ended up choosing Team Romney.

Proving that Ron Paul supporters are very, very confused.

11 posted on 03/28/2012 10:04:35 AM PDT by Finny ("The rules are made for people who aren't willing to make up their own." -- C. Yeager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring
did he run out of fake eyebrows?

I mean cerially!!! Who wears FAKE EYEBROWS???


13 posted on 03/28/2012 10:09:06 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (3 little girls murdered by islam, Toulouse March 2012 . Time for the Final Crusade!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

The article doesn’t support the conclusion in the headline not to mention that it is an incredibly poorly written piece.


15 posted on 03/28/2012 10:10:58 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

RON PAUL 2016! WOOOOOOOOO!


17 posted on 03/28/2012 10:18:54 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

More votes for Romney, the only other candidate on the GOP side close to their liberal ideas.


18 posted on 03/28/2012 10:21:51 AM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

A lot of speculation. Paul wont drop out because he believes in his cause.


19 posted on 03/28/2012 10:23:24 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

I guess Paul can’t deliver on his end of the deal to get Rand named as Romney’s Veep. If you don’t have enough delegates to put Romney over the top in the event he fails to get a majority before the convention, then you are of no use.

I’m sure this frustrates him. He LOVES being the turd in the punch bowl.


20 posted on 03/28/2012 10:24:46 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Not Romney - Not ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

I believe Paul will stay in it to the end and amass as many delegates as he can. Truth is, if Romney does not win it outright, then it is likely that Paul will hold enough delegates to put either Romney, or the not-Romney camp over the top.

He will play that for as much influence as he can...and it is likely to be large because he will hold that key, IMHO, if Romney fails to get enough delegates or to win on the first ballot.

GOP Presidential Primary Tracker
http://www.jeffhead.com/GOPTracker.htm


21 posted on 03/28/2012 10:25:11 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

I hate sloppy reporting designed to force your reading...

Headline - “Ron Paul Will”

Story - “Will Ron Paul?”


26 posted on 03/28/2012 10:50:46 AM PDT by NavyCanDo (You can take an idiot out of Chicago, but you canÂ’t take the Chicago out of an idiot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Romney told Letterman that he had not begun to think about a list of possible of VP running mates, yet he has told GOP elite in several states that someone from their state was on the short list. Of course that was in the weeks just before the state caucus or election. In WA State, Romney said that a conservative woman congress representative was at the top of his short list. Then we heard that it was Rand Paul. I’m sure that some of you have also heard that someone from your state was under consideration, as well.


27 posted on 03/28/2012 10:53:23 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

No, he won’t quit. He never had a chance to begin with, but when has that ever stopped the guy? He loves being a spoiler.

And that’s aside from the possibility that he made a deal with Romney to attack the other candidates but never Romney, if Romney would offer the VP slot to Rand Paul. We don’t know that for sure, but there was at least some evidence that it might be the case.


31 posted on 03/28/2012 11:08:31 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehring

Dr. Paul;

Thank you for your years of service, all of the healthy babies you delivered, your steadfast support for pro-life, and your diligence in looking after the Federal Reserve.

Now, please exit, stage right.


33 posted on 03/28/2012 11:36:46 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson