Exactly what I think. The only thing I would suggest as a an alternate possibility is that the forger might not have been aware that the layers would expose his(her?) work, or he(she?) may have just forgotten to flatten the image file. Obviously the people handling the file on the White House end were ignorant (probably because they are stupid democrats) and and didn't know they would be posting the evidence of it's own creation when they posted it.
I have suggested that this file may have been sent to Obama's Attorney as a "proof" for him to peruse to insure compliance with his request before the court to amend or replace the document. It would be quite an easy thing for a man knowledgeable in law, but ignorant in the nuts and bolts of computer technology, to send the file on to other ignorant staff members at the White House. Perhaps Obama himself sent the file to his staff after having received it from his attorney?
In any case, this idea makes more sense to me than any other explanation of which I have heard.
Nuff said....
“The forger is in Hawaii, no document was printed out.”
I think it is highly unlikely that HI officials had anything to do with creating the forgery. There was no logical, legitimate "adoption" scenario involved in justifying this forged pdf. HI officials most likely only received an electronic image from Chicago (the source of all criminal acts behind Barry) with layers of plausible deniability for the transmission of the pdf to protect both the WH and HI.
HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.
The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.
Probably an amateur who had no idea it could be picked apart so quickly like this.
It's been sold to us as a genuine copy of an original document. Addition or not, it's a deception. Its fraud.