Is Breyer senile?
What does the Governemnt opening a bank have to do with forcing citizens to buy something? No one had to use the bank if they did not want to..
Having just read his so-called “explanation”, and despite the fact I am NOT a lawyer (thank God), I have to say that represents some of the most convoluted, twisted, tortured “logic” I’ve seen in a long, long time.
What an idiot.
Breyer ought to be forced to buy me a fleet of Cadillacs. I need them.
There’s a lot of anticipation that the Supremes will toss out Obamacare...The opening of Mark Levin’s show dedicated to the discussion of the courts proceedings warned that the Court could go the other way.
By the time the SCOTUS decision arrives the candidate question should be semi resolved.
With Romney at the helm and the PCs (pseudo-cons-servatives) in charge what will happen ?
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."-- James Madison, the Father of the U.S. Constitution
KaganLezbo and Soda-my-ass jumped in to demonstrate what side of the Constitution they are using for their ruling - the blank side!
And make us buy (and eat) broccoli because it’ll make us healthy.
Breyer is interesting, in that he highlights the differences between Clinton and Zero.
Breyer is a Stalinist, in many ways he’s the worst of the bunch. But he’s well-cloaked. Clinton (or, more likely, the Clintons) knew to pick him out of a crowd because he concealed well. Breyer would never be seen having dinner with Sibelius while hearing this case.
Look at the contrast with Kagan and the wise Latina. Zero has no ability to cover his tracks.
Hopefully, it will cost him.
I refuse to submit to Congress, but can't fight a revolution alone. We need a rallying point.
In the end, the Revolution was about free men deciding they were free men, and not submitting to those who said otherwise. Those same free men gave us the Constitution, which was supposed to keep us free from such thinking as Breyer’s.
Personally, I think we lost our freedom some time ago, and continue to, as we are simply submitting to the tyranny daily. It's been the slow boiling of a frog theory right before our eyes. I flew across country two weeks ago, and watched how we all smartly got in line to be violated by government agents in order to fly on an airplane. It was like watching herded cattle.
Obamacare will win. Breyer’s thinking is not an exception on the US Supreme Court. Congress can do as it pleases.
King George made the same mistake about trying to force American Commerce......
Seems Breyer should not be wearing judicial robes during this argument. Rather he should be wearing his cheerleader skirt and his swaeater with the big O and waving his pom poms.
This is a look into the mind of a GODless, communist, black robed terrorist.
LLS
Breyer is a parody of the eccentric Supreme Court appointee. He is always incomprehensible, but the leftward trend of his decisions is easily understood.
Breyer is illustrating that he is not that bright. He’s just another theorist like Wilson who worships at the altar of big government because it has been his means of moving up the ranks.
That’s the attraction of the Left for most Democrats I know. You don’t have to be conversant in facts and data or articulate a coherent argument. Just espouse the accepted ideology in school, mediator, Hollywood or government and grades, perks and positions will be yours. This case proves that point. Look at the performance of the Solicitor General, the liberal justices and the Dems who passed this bill. These people are supposed to be some of the smartest in the land, but they are seriously incompetent. Ditto the Attorney General.
Breyer is illustrating that he is not that bright. He’s just another theorist like Wilson who worships at the altar of big government because it has been his means of moving up the ranks.
That’s the attraction of the Left for most Democrats I know. You don’t have to be conversant in facts and data or articulate a coherent argument. Just espouse the accepted ideology in school, media, Hollywood or government and grades, perks and positions will be yours. This case proves that point. Look at the performance of the Solicitor General, the liberal justices and the Dems who passed this bill. These people are supposed to be some of the smartest in the land, but they are seriously incompetent. Ditto the Attorney General.
When Obamacare gets tossed by the SCOTUS look for those who voted for it to either “retire” or run for cover. Especially if they are up for reelection. Hopefully bye bye Stabenow in Michigan.
After we are forced to buy Obamacare, the next thing we will be forced to buy will be Government Motor’s Volt. From there, we will be required to only eat what the first bitch orders us to....and buy it from government owned grocery stores.
In a case of FCC allowing or censoring profanity on ‘family time’ TV a few years back (I think during Colin Powell’s kid’s tenure as chair - so it had to be a clear cut case of obscenity), Breyer I’m sure wrote the dissenting opinion that profanity HAD to be used, could NOT be so restricted in order to affirm, assert the powers of the First Amendment.
The four liberal justices on the supreme court have no regard whatsover to the US Constitution. God help us if Obama gets another 4 years to appoint another justice. Listening to the four idiots makes the case we must support the GOP nominee and take our chances.