Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unkus
Suspicion of the media had already been heightened following the 'Fluke' fiasco. I think the deceptive use of photos for maximum gain of sympathy for Trayvon and for maximum prejudice against Zimmerman by the media caused many Americans to rethink their perception of the media.

Over the next few months leading up to the election we should see Americans abandoning the traditional news outlets in droves (CBS,NBC,ABC,etc). Fox News ratings will skyrocket as a result.

14 posted on 03/29/2012 11:02:42 AM PDT by FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs

Good points.


18 posted on 03/29/2012 11:13:27 AM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
Suspicion of the media had already been heightened following the 'Fluke' fiasco. I think the deceptive use of photos for maximum gain of sympathy for Trayvon and for maximum prejudice against Zimmerman by the media caused many Americans to rethink their perception of the media.

If the attempted blaming of the Republicans and Palin for the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords didn't already permanently sour people on trusting the media, then nothing will.

The Republicans are put in a somewhat tougher spot if Obamacare is struck down. Suddenly instead of arguing against an unpopular bill, they have to create their own bill and sell it against something else new from the Democrats. Instead of being in the lead, they have to start the race all over again. And the public will either have forgotten about Obamacare or won't care by the time November rolls around. The notion that it was struck down will be a distant memory, something the media won't be talking about or asking about at the debates.

Romney won't have any special credibility on this issue because he can't point to what he did in Mass. as a model for the nation. He can push the states' rights angle, but that would contradict the idea of selling insurance across state lines, which conservatives seem to want. Although I'm not sure where RINO Romney stands on that issue.

If only the mandate is struck down, there could be a different type of fight or an interim fight. I'm sure that Congress will have enough votes to override a veto on striking down the rule that insurance companies have to cover pre-existing conditions. The insurance lobby will make sure of that. But the White House might set it up so Dems not up for reelection vote for that override, while Obama can publically tell people he vetoed an attempt to stop universal coverage while he insists Congress come up with new funding for it.

25 posted on 03/29/2012 11:54:37 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson