Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Delivers a Death Blow to the Coal Industry
rontPage Magazine ^ | March 30, 2012 | Rich Trzupek

Posted on 03/30/2012 5:03:44 AM PDT by SJackson

The coal industry and coal-fired power has been dealt a series of body blows by the Obama administration over the last four years. Yesterday, the EPA delivered the coup de grace to coal, in the form of a new rule that – unless overturned by Congress or a future administration – will ensure that no new, modern coal-fired power plants will be built in the United States.

The EPA released Subpart TTTT of New Source Performance Standards yesterday, a proposed rule that limits carbon dioxide emissions from new power plants. No coal-fired power plant can meet the emission limit (1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt of power produced), but natural gas-fired power plants can. This will lead to some significant changes in the power energy once the rule goes final, sometime next year.

It is now estimated that around 50,000 to 80,000 megawatts of coal fired power will be retired from the grid over the next few years. Coal fired power is base load power (that is, power that has to be available all of the time) and neither solar nor wind can provide base load power anywhere but in the President’s green fantasies. Biomass (wood, energy crops, etc.) can provide base load power, but there’s not nearly enough of the fuel to replace so much coal. More nuclear power could easily shoulder the load, but there’s no way that we can permit and build enough nuclear plants in the time available. That leaves natural gas as the only fuel that can possibly be used to replace all of that coal.

Right now, natural gas is looking pretty good. Thanks to shale gas, we have abundant supplies (over one hundred years of proven reserves, even in the worst-case demand scenario) and prices are incredibly low. New, highly efficient combined-cycle gas-fired power plants are actually competitive with coal-fired power at today’s prices.

Replacing all of that coal with natural gas should soothe global warming alarmists as well. (I say “should” because everyone knows that the environmental doom industry cannot and will not ever admit that it is satisfied with any level of reductions until we’re living in caves.) Natural gas generates much less carbon dioxide per unit of energy as compared to coal and, as noted above, natural gas-fired power plants can be much more efficient. The combination of these two effects means that carbon dioxide emissions in the United States, which have been declining for the last five years in any case, will drop even more precipitously in the future.

So, one might be tempted to ask: what’s the big deal? If natural gas is cheap and if burning natural gas might cause at least a few hysterical enviro-types to lower the volume of their incessant shrieking just a tad, it’s all good – right? Well, not quite.

Historically, natural gas prices have been very volatile and, despite the current glut, there is no reason to believe that supply will so greatly outstrip demand in the long run. The big energy players in natural gas, companies like Chesapeake, Cabot and Chevron, are working hard to create new markets, increase demand and thus get prices back up. A major South African chemical company recently announced plans to build a plant here that will produce gasoline from natural gas feedstock. Several players in the energy market are in the initial stages of planning Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminals with exports to Europe and Asia in mind. There are plans in the works to create more natural gas infrastructure so that the nation’s truck fleet will convert over from diesel to natural gas.

Perhaps most importantly, using natural gas to generate thousands of megawatts of power will consume huge quantities of the fuel, thus necessarily causing prices to rise as more new power plants come on line. It’s no surprise that the two big manufacturers of natural gas fired-turbines – GE and Siemens – have been flooding the airwaves with commercials extolling the virtues of their wares. Both companies stand to make a whole lot of money in the next few years thanks to the Obama administration’s all-out war on coal.

In contrast to the volatility of natural gas prices, coal prices have always been pretty steady. Thus the coal fleet (along with the nuclear fleet) has helped to dampen out any fluctuations in natural gas that affects that relatively small portion of energy production in the United States. As we shift away from coal and put more of the energy burden on natural gas, electricity prices are likely to fluctuate more than they ever have and are likely to increase substantially over the long term as well.

It’s a shame that we’re knowingly abandoning such a cheap, reliable and plentiful resource like coal in a foolish effort to fulfill a ridiculous crusade led by eco-puritans. It’s maddening that such a decision was made not by Congress, nor by the voters, but by a few faceless bureaucrats hiding behind global-warming pseudo-science that has become the twenty-first century’s version of alchemy. But that’s where we are and, unless something changes this November, that’s where we’re likely to be for quite a while.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/30/obama-delivers-a-death-blow-to-coal-industry/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coal; energy; naturalgas; shalegas

1 posted on 03/30/2012 5:03:48 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The power to regulate is the power to destroy.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

2 posted on 03/30/2012 5:05:59 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

This will not stand.


3 posted on 03/30/2012 5:10:12 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

How much did that oil baron, Pickton, pay Obama to do this?

At least, I think that’s his name.


4 posted on 03/30/2012 5:10:44 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

When the Japanese evacuate their radio active homeland...


5 posted on 03/30/2012 5:11:05 AM PDT by chainsaw (Sarah Palin is still my first choice to save the USA. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Coal miner’s and their Union Bosses knew this was coming and still chose to vote for this b - - - - - d!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnEJ8v46Uhc


6 posted on 03/30/2012 5:14:37 AM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

T. Boone Pickens?


7 posted on 03/30/2012 5:15:00 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The hole in Mr. Trzupek’s logic is that there are also enviro-nuts who are against fracking for natural gas. Once the coal industry is dead & buried (to accommodate Obama’s wishes), the wackos will just move on to their next crusade to destroy an energy source.


8 posted on 03/30/2012 5:16:59 AM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I think you might mean T. Boone Pickens...


9 posted on 03/30/2012 5:17:33 AM PDT by YepYep ((We've just GOT to love Jesus enough to LISTEN to Him, and Do what He Says))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Yes. He was big into the alternate energies and he’s also big in natural gas. I also read that he’s a supporter of Obama.

I think it’s reasonable to say he is motivated to support Obama.


10 posted on 03/30/2012 5:17:38 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This is step one. The next step will be to reduce emissions so natural gas does not fit as well. Then all power plants would then have to be generated using windmills and sun panels. Bank on it.


11 posted on 03/30/2012 5:18:47 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else (Maybe Tim Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YepYep

That is exactly whom I mean.


12 posted on 03/30/2012 5:19:58 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This should be no surprise to the West Virginia assholes that voted for Obama in 2008. The idiots.


13 posted on 03/30/2012 5:22:12 AM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

:: over one hundred years of proven reserves ::

At today’s demand and allowing for normal increases over 100 years.

Turning the electrical generation industry and the long-haul trucking industry to NG is not provided for in the estimation above.


14 posted on 03/30/2012 5:26:52 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
So where is Richard Trumka?

He's former president of the UMWA?

I guess the SOBs their coming to get are the miners.

15 posted on 03/30/2012 5:28:16 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

“The power to regulate is the power to destroy.”

I think that I would not feel badly if obama were to have a cardiac episode that would end his life.


16 posted on 03/30/2012 5:32:12 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Obama Delivers a Death Blow to the Coal Industry

Recall: during the campaign in '08, 0bama said he was going to kill the coal industry, yet Pennsylvania went for this commie. If those that will be losing jobs, etc. due to the usurper are seeking sympathy, I suggest talking to your union bosses, because there is none here.

17 posted on 03/30/2012 5:37:44 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
List of states that should or could be influenced to vote conservative based on the coal issue:

Well, probably not Illinois.

State (annual short tons)
-------------------------
Wyoming (338,900)
West Virginia (158,257)
Kentucky (130,688)
Pennsylvania (74,619)

Texas (49,498)
Montana (38,352)
Illinois (33,444)
Virginia (32,834)
North Dakota (31,270)
Colorado (29,137)
Indiana (27,965)
New Mexico (27,323)
Utah (26,656)
Ohio (22,269)
Alabama (19,324)
Arizona (13,111)

18 posted on 03/30/2012 5:51:36 AM PDT by citizen (Well, what happened to my tagline?? I must have overwritten it...time for a new one anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
T-Bone Pickings ( Dog Food ).

If voters had a brain this would cost Obumble WV,VA,PA,OH,KY, and TN at the least.

19 posted on 03/30/2012 5:53:54 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Natural gas has MUCH higher value for heating our offices and homes. It is sheer lunacy to use it to make electricity when we have so much abundant coal. Each resource should be applied to its highest value use.

It’s been said we have 100 years of natural gas reserves. That will go by in a flash and then what exactly will fill the pipelines?


20 posted on 03/30/2012 6:25:42 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

First the coal plant, next your wood stove, and we will all die from cold related starvation.


21 posted on 03/30/2012 6:26:14 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Obama did say before he was elected that he hoped to bankrupt the coal industry, and that energy prices under my administration “would necessarily skyrocket”. Obama’s words verbatum. You can even see the video of Obama saying this on Youtube. Now, how does a guy who probably knows nothing about coal industry or coal, come to despise them so much that he hopes to bankupt them, forcing tens of thousands into unemployment, making it more difficult and expensive for the average consumer to heat their homes? Answer: He is paying back his big environmentalist extremist donors who in turn, got most of their cash from Dr. Evil, George Soros. So in effect, George Soros is now controlling federal energy policy by putting whole energy industries out of business and this will eventually worsen and deepen the nation’s unemployment picture. Oh wait, I almost forgot in 20 years or so we will all heat and power our homes and run our cars with algae and solar and wind and biodegradable trash. I just can’t wait for that day — so exciting! In the meantime all we have to do is begin to save lots of our income (if we even have a job) to pay off that monthly home electric bill that will soon average about $600, because Obama thinks it’s better to bankrupt the coal industry than for Americans to have access to cheap energy. What in blazes were the American people thinking when they put this nincompoop in the White House??? I mean, Bush certainly wasn’t the greatest, but this guy is a complete disaster for anything that is good or valuble in America. Vote him the f**k out of there already!


22 posted on 03/30/2012 6:26:53 AM PDT by BombHollywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

District Judge Amy Jackson Friday said the Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its authority in the retroactive veto of a permit for the Spruce No. 1 Coal mine in West Virginia. The decision states the EPA’s veto of the Spruce Mine permit was ‘unprecedented’ and it acted in a manner that was ‘arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with law.


23 posted on 03/30/2012 6:31:30 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlphaOneAlpha

I agree.
But I don’t hear a word from the coal states.


24 posted on 03/30/2012 6:35:44 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

This is one promise Skippy has kept. People of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, are you paying attention?


25 posted on 03/30/2012 6:43:52 AM PDT by NotTallTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Get him out of here or we will be sitting in the dark and cold.


26 posted on 03/30/2012 6:46:52 AM PDT by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

These are the same people who will claim that incandescent lights haven’t been banned. Oh no. They just passed efficiency rules that, under the laws of physics, no incandescent light can ever meet. But they’re not banned.


27 posted on 03/30/2012 6:59:34 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Hey, West Virginia...

How yinz likin’ yer Joe Manchin vote now???


28 posted on 03/30/2012 7:00:59 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

We’ll burn all the NG and then go back to burning coal.


29 posted on 03/30/2012 7:01:21 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

T. Boone Pickens?

This doesn’t help him; he is pushing Natural Gas to fuel vehicles.

This will close coal power plants and consume more natural gas to provide electrical power. It will raise the wholesale price of natural gas making less profit if used for vehicle fuel.


30 posted on 03/30/2012 8:17:50 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Then we’ll get the real life “Hunger Games”...


31 posted on 03/30/2012 9:56:45 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Occupy the Gun Range!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I repeat:

The following states should secede from the current count of 50 and form The Western States of America:

Arizona
New Mexico
Texas
Oklahoma
Missouri
Kansas
Nebraska
S Dakota
N Dakota
Montana
Wyoming
Idaho
Colorado
Utah
Nevada
& possible Alaska.

Then they can use the resources they have, with no interference from the EPA. They have enough people to guard their borders. They can grow enough food & mine coal, gold, silver, copper, etc as needed. They can pipe it to refineries in Texas as they need.

I propose that Sheriff Joe Arpaio become the first head of true SECURITY for these states.


32 posted on 03/30/2012 2:35:13 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen

GEEE—7 of my choice of 15 states that should secede are on this coal production list.

Guess I hit a jackpot!!


33 posted on 03/30/2012 2:37:30 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AlphaOneAlpha
yeah, but they weren't all a-holes. West virginia went for McCain as a state. Don't think they'll go for the usurper next Fall. Now we'll see how stupid the voters of Pennsylavania and Ohio are.
34 posted on 03/30/2012 3:19:25 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Great idea. Then we can all have coal bins in our basements and enjoy shoveling the filthy stuff into our furnaces.


35 posted on 03/30/2012 7:03:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson