[okie01]

Gullible? No. It’s obvious that the Republicans are not going to do what it is going to take to protect marriage and the natural family.

You are demonstrating an amazing ability to avoid the subject of our conversation.

My initial comments extended solely to the content of a news article -- which I identified as fundamentally dishonest reporting and rather brazen propaganda.

So far, you have accused me of being "ignorant" and a "leftist" -- while expressing a voluble and profound distrust of Republican legislators -- but have yet to address my assessment of the news article. Or apologize for slandering me without justification.

Sigh...

[DBeers]

My initial comments extended solely to the content of a news article -- which I identified as fundamentally dishonest reporting and rather brazen propaganda.

I agree, there is much defeatist premised propaganda. Regardless, the merits of the contention of the article, the issues underlying it remain a real clear and present danger to the Republic.

I agree, the article stinks; however, it does provide a springboard from which the issues get discussed.

[EternalVigilance]

I called you neither. Do you have reading comprehension problems?

You: the economy is a bigger issue than "gay rights". To which, I'd wager that most of us would agree.

Me: What folks like yourself ignore, or are simply ignorant of, is that the natural family is the very basis for economics. It's even the root of the etymology of the very word economics.

Money problems are the symptom, not the disease. The destruction of the basic unit of our civilization, the family, is the disease.

And, like leftists, y'all just want us to blow that off as unimportant.

Digging down to why that is might be interesting, although I could make a pretty good guess if I was so inclined.

47 posted on Friday, March 30, 2012 6:56:45 PM by EternalVigilance

I stand by my response.