Fine. Let’s raise the price of hunting licenses to help cover the cost of damages these vermin do. Doe are over populated and hunters don’t want them. I’ll go back to my earlier statement. A hunter should have to bag two doe before they are allowed one buck. Before they can take a second buck, two more does
“Fine. Let’s raise the price of hunting licenses to help cover the cost of damages these vermin do. Doe are over populated and hunters don’t want them...”
Spagetti logic! You have a problem and want to penalize outsiders with exorbitant fees to induce them to come help you solve YOUR problem?!? No wonder the deer like it there!
JC
“Fine. Let’s raise the price of hunting licenses to help cover the cost of damages these vermin do. Doe are over populated and hunters don’t want them. I’ll go back to my earlier statement. A hunter should have to bag two doe before they are allowed one buck. Before they can take a second buck, two more does”
You just don’t get it, do you! You want to charge us who would be doing you a favor in reducing the reproduction rate(sounds like a liberal progressive). Good effing luck, it ain’t worth it! Yada, yada, yada...
Let me give you an analogy that you might understand...you have a LARGE, diseased, unstable tree hanging over your neighbor’s house and you advertise for a tree service firm to remove this hazard, yet when he shows up and volunteers to remove the tree IF he can keep the firewood, YOU want to charge him for the “opportunity” to remove the tree And for the value of the firewood! Just stupid!!
Stew in your own juices!!
JC