To: Olog-hai
I hope they are successful at returning to using earmarks, it is the the correct way to allocate money and direct it’s spending. The other way is to let the Executive Branch decide where the money is to be spent.
2 posted on
03/31/2012 5:32:27 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican SOCIALISTelites, are Big Government socialists,)
To: stockpirate
There needs to be some Aristotelian guidance
Moderation
The ear marks must not get out of hand
6 posted on
03/31/2012 5:35:27 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
To: stockpirate
The EB has no such power. We do have separation of powers here.
I would guess that you are therefore saying that the Tea Party is wrong in opposition to earmarks?
7 posted on
03/31/2012 5:37:09 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: stockpirate
With Romney marching to the nomination it’s becoming more obvious by the day that the tea party is a paper tiger; ceasing to pay attention to the dead movement’s demands is fully pragmatic on their part.
Don’t blame me, I’m only the messenger.
11 posted on
03/31/2012 5:50:15 PM PDT by
eclecticEel
(Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
To: stockpirate
I hope they are successful at returning to using earmarks, it is the the correct way to allocate money and direct its spending. I agree. In the absence of earmarks, Obama's minions determine how appropriated money will be spent. And it's important to remember that, in the absence of earmarks, spending has only gone up. The whole earmark brouhaha was just boob bait for the bubbas.
15 posted on
03/31/2012 7:52:17 PM PDT by
BfloGuy
(The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson