Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
-- I'm going to go against the flow and bet that after she reviews everything she will come to the same conclusion as the previous prosecutor and say "nothing to indict here." --

I think so too. There is plenty of evidence. The witnesses who appear to be giving testimony that is Pro-Martin's version have been inconsistent or have no basis for their conclusions.

A good course of action is to bring out the evidence in a nice package, redact information to protect the witnesses against retribution, and let the media deal with the bed it made for itself.

She can express sympathy with the Martin family, and lay blame at Trayvon's feet without making him into an all-out hoodlum. Sometimes teenagers start fights. Trayvon didn't have the good sense to limit his attack, not to justify starting it in the first place, but the consequences would have been less than death had he taken a few punches and run off.

90 posted on 04/02/2012 6:06:43 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

I hope that’s how the state attorney deals with it. That would be reasonable and professional.


95 posted on 04/02/2012 12:41:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson