Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: caww; muawiyah

Yes, BUT -0- would be willing to use Newt’s reason for his (-0-’s) excuse to 1)ignore the ruling or 2)bring the Supreme Court justices before Congress/impeachment. The reasons might be different, but the end would be the same.


41 posted on 04/02/2012 9:42:43 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: madison10
Look, nothing stops Obama if he chooses to ignore it...and the same goes for the Supreme Courts decision, he'll do whatever he determines....how he justify's it is another matter...and one that I could care less about because however he frames it it's deceptive if not an outright lie.

I don't have a problem with some degree of control on the selection of Surpreme Court Justices. I'd also like to see them limited to how long they serve. Gingsberg should be done and over with for crying outloud! What is she 92?

So I'm glad attention is brought to them now.

43 posted on 04/02/2012 10:18:12 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

Doesn’t matter. The Justices can be impeached whatever rationale is used ~ but Congress has to do that.


49 posted on 04/03/2012 5:12:58 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson