Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giving Women the Access Code
New York Times ^ | April 2, 2012 | KATIE HAFNER

Posted on 04/03/2012 5:37:44 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: camle
isn’t it far better to encourage people to do what thet want to do?

No, those are called "hobbies" and they don't pay well. It would be hard to look at my kids and say "I can't provide much for you but I enjoy my low stress hobby job. Too bad for you all". Couldn't live like that.

61 posted on 04/06/2012 6:53:25 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Where are the articles decrying the lack of men in early education???


62 posted on 04/07/2012 12:06:53 AM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Women having careers doesn’t stop them from having kids.


63 posted on 04/07/2012 12:11:32 AM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DNA.2012

“Women having careers doesn’t stop them from having kids.”

You just hate men!!! (just kidding, nice to have a civil discussion)

Of course women have choices now. They can work, and not have kids; they can work and have kids; they can work and delay having kids and then have very few kids.

The problem isn’t with the individual decisions, but it’s with the collective effect. Before women were widely in the workforce, there was not a whole lot to do, and women had kids early, and had a lot of them. Once they could work, for many (not all, of course), kids become a career burden. When you add up the total effect, you find birth rates take a dive. In the US, the main reason we’re not going down yet is immigration. We’re also helped because we still have some people (Christians and practicing Catholics) that believe in large families. In Europe, they’re basically flat, but their native populations are in a dive. It’s Muslim immigration there that’s hold up their populations - which is not good.

In Asia it’s even worse - before women could work, they had no chose but to marry and have kids. Now that they can work, they look at the guys over there and say “why do I want to spend time with one of them” and simply never marry and never even come close to being married. The guys aren’t much better - they spend their days playing video games and barely realize that life is passing them by. In those countries they are either losing population, or about to.

http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_pop_grow&idim=country:JPN&dl=en&hl=en&q=population+growth+in+japan

At the same time the countries where women are treated like dirt still have hugely growing populations. So the bottom line is that the West is getting killed in the demographic war, and that will cannot end well...and there’s not much that can be done about it now (it’s too late).

http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_pop_grow&idim=country:MLI&dl=en&hl=en&q=population+growth+in+mali


64 posted on 04/07/2012 4:11:46 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: BobL
the West is getting killed in the demographic war, and that cannot end well

If it continues that way, things will get worse.

There’s not much that can be done about it now

Of course, there are things that can be done: ban abortion, make it easier to raise big families, and severely restrict immigration, just to name 3.

65 posted on 04/07/2012 4:17:48 PM PDT by DNA.2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DNA.2012

“Of course, there are things that can be done: ban abortion, make it easier to raise big families, and severely restrict immigration, just to name 3.”

Ban birth control too (LOL). In Japan, they’ll need something like 8 kids from every woman now, just to have a population in 2050 that matches today (i.e., there are VERY FEW women of child-bearing age in existence now). That’s what I was getting at.

But, yes, there are still things that can be done. But they are drastic. First, we either have to make women barefoot and pregnant again - or we have to accept the FACT that children are, to many women, simply another career option. If we choose to accept that, we have to pay women (or really couples) LOTS OF MONEY to have multiple kids, as in $5,000 per year for the second kid, $10,000 per year for the third kid, and $15,000 per year for additional kids. Then we have to, somehow, make sure that we don’t just send all of that money to minority cultures that would have had boatloads of kids anyway. Not easy to do, at all - that’s why I worry so much.


66 posted on 04/07/2012 8:16:56 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: central_va

welll. if somebody wants to be a dentist, why try and convince them to be an engineer? just because of their gender?


67 posted on 04/09/2012 4:20:57 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson