the infowarrior
New name for you, minister of disinformation. You don't like being manipulated, but the last response to me was very evasive and when asked point blank about your intentions you bail out.
I am not trying to manipulate you but asking you a direct question is not manipulation.
Your answer though is about what I expected. Just don't post again that you have not said you won't vote for Romney, because your response here makes it perfectly clear.
You might as well send a donation to Obama and work on his committee.
Pathetic
Bullsquat! *YOU* never even bothered to answer *my* question at all, so you are being manipulative whether you choose to admit it, or not.
I'll put it to you this way, so you can possibly understand *exactly* where I'm coming from: Elections in this country are held by *secret* ballot, whether you like it, or not. My choice for president is *my* business, and most emphatically not that of K-Rove, Inc's. And, if you don't believe that K-Rove and Co aren't monitoring this forum, to see how their little game is going over, you are incredibly naive, are working for them, and thus no conservative, or both simultaneously. There is absolutely no way in h-ll I'm about to *publicly* commit to Romney where they could see it whether I plan on voting for him, or not.
Now, I've answered *your* question, will you have the common courtesy to answer mine, to wit: Given Romney's track record of judicial appointments as Governor of Massachusetts, and the GOP Senators long tradition of voting to affirm whoever *any* president desires to appoint to SCOTUS, do you really believe that his SCOTUS picks are a reason to discount his other *troublesome* qualities?
Take your time...
the infowarrior