Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

I’m more concerned about Santorum’s war on porn than Romney’s war on marriage. Why?

Romney is not running on social issues, Santorum is. Social issues do not play well to the middle who will decide our next president. They don’t need the distraction.

So in this regard, Santorum makes Romney look good; sad to say.


10 posted on 04/03/2012 11:52:21 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cicero2k

Gosh, everytime the republicans run a liberal they lose. You’d think they would learn. Social conservatives are the only republicans who actually win. Odd that.


18 posted on 04/03/2012 12:04:29 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: cicero2k

Sad to hear you say that too.

Romney’s not running on social issues because he’d lose big time. He’s also not running on his socialist past history because he couldn’t claim to be severely conservative if he did.

Politicians, like Mitt, who give tax payer provided cars, car insurance and AAA memberships to welfare recipients are not fiscal conservatives. Politicians who support the gay agenda and fifty dollar abortions are not social conservatives. A politician whose company attempts to fulfill the Red Chinese desire to steal American secrets is not a patriot. Politicians who ban guns don’t support RBKA.

What part of Mitt Romney do you love so much? Or just do you just hate social conservatives so much that any old commie will do.


37 posted on 04/03/2012 3:19:56 PM PDT by Waryone (Remember your ABCS (anybody but commie socialists) = ABM (anybody but Mitt), ABO (anybody but Obama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson