Posted on 04/03/2012 5:12:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Obama is a coward and a liar. Period.
History will remember how Paul Ryan sold out to the establishment as well. What’s he going to say when Romney loses?
” Paul Ryan to Obama: History will remember you ... “
Better if Zero were swept into the ‘dustbin of history’ along with all of the other would-be tyrants forgotten by History....
If history doesn’t iremember, I will remind it.
Traitor! I hope the 30 pieces of silver he was given buy him a lot of happiness.
RE: What’s he going to say when Romney loses?
That he endorsed the wrong person.
The great Ronald Reagan endorsed a few losers himself. Barry Goldwater and Papa Bush in 1992 (After he broke his “Read my lips” pledge) among them.
If you notice Obama labeled Ryan’s budget a “trojan horse”. This is an effort marginalize/negate language. This was the criticism of Obamacare. In other words: I’m rubber, your glue, whatever you say... (you get the idea) These are the linguistic parlor games of the left targeted at his pea brained base.
History will be kind to Obama, because only Bill Ayers will be allowed to write it.
(apologies for paraphrasing Winston Churchill)
Traitor indeed! No one in the Establishment has the courage to call out Barry Soetoro for the willful purposeful intentional non-accidental destruction of America. All of these traitors have violated their oath of Office and all should be dealt with accordingly. It is a very short list in Washington of those who are doing the right thing.
Blame Obama? That’s nuts. Congress is in charge of public policy - see US Constitution. Nothing preventing Congress from changing fiscal policy. Well, the president isn’t preventing it.
RE: Nothing preventing Congress from changing fiscal policy.
This congress just did by PASSING the Paul Ryan fiscal plan. Obama opposes it.
Funny
He is not US citizen
I think the VP race is between Rubio and Ryan. If Rubio doesn’t want it, then Ryan gets it. If Rubio lacks the gravitas, then Ryan gets it.
Ronald Reagan did not say, and I cannot conceive of him saying, he endorsed the wrong person.
My point is Ronald Reagan endorsed people who LOST the elections. Heck, Reagan even endorsed an unabashed liberal RINO from CT for Senator named Lowell Weicker ( who did nothing for him ), who eventually, like Arlen Specter and Michael Bloomberg, LEFT the GOP.
So, I don’t think it is a bad mark on Paul Ryan to have endorsed Romney ( whether he wins or loses ).
I think in Paul Ryan’s view, whether you agree or disagree with him, to endorse any one of the other three at this point in time is really pointless.
Paul Ryan is an outcast to me!
There are similarities between Paul Ryan at this stage of his career endorsing a presidential contender in the 2012 pre-convention time period and a young Ronald Reagan making an endorsement in 1964, but that’s as far as it goes. For your analogy to work, or if there is any similarity as to how Reagan’s endorsement of a general election-losing Goldwater affected Reagan’s career, and how Ryan’s endorsement of a general election-losing Romney would affect Ryan’s career - Reagan would have had to endorse the LIBERAL in the ‘64 race, not the conservative. Ironically, one liberal in ‘64 that Reagan did NOT endorse was also named Romney. (another was named Rockefeller).
Paul Ryan bump! He was great on FNC tonight responding to Obama’s dogma.
>> Paul Ryan is an outcast to me!
That’s a shame. He’s brilliant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.