[conservative98]

So what. I was here but not posting at the time. For you to state there were *JUST* 2 reasons that gave us Romney and for one to be Palin and to call Palin supporters nasty AND "worshipping at her altar" and deluded fools just shows your bias.

There was plenty of time to get around one candidate. Palin announced in October. Reagan didn't announce until Novemeber. It wasn't Palin's fault there weren't any one candidate people would rally around and when they did they got carpet bombed and lost interest. This isn't Palin's or Palin's supporters fault. Palin is not even a top reason let alone one of the only two. If you wanted to be fair and not just take shots at Palin and Palin supporters you would have stated it was the $$$$ and attacks by Romney.

[gogogodzilla]

What else do you call a person who will not see what is directly in front of their own eyes? Palin was not forming state-level campaign organizations nor was she gathering the necessary signatures in each state to get on the ballot.

That information was right in front of the eyes of every Palin supporter. It was shouted from the rooftops. Yet, they did not believe it. They had faith that she’d run... and that was all that mattered.

And the level of attacks against those that pointed it out rivaled that of the Spanish Inquisition.

So what else would you call them? Informed citizenry? No, deluded fool is a more apt term.

And simply having faith that something will happen despite all evidence to the contrary is very much like a cult. Hence the reference to ‘worshipping at her altar’.