Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: monkeyshine
When “they” told us to reduce fat intake, the substitution of Fat for Sugar may have been seriously detrimental.

Obviously reducing fat intake is healthy, so long as sugar isn't used as a substitute for fat, to add taste. Unfortunately, a few "low-fat" products such as low-fat yogurts, in Australia at least, focus on reduced-fat labels (e.g. 70% less fat or non-fat) for marketing purposes, but don't mention that fat taken out has been replaced by adding sugar. They have high sugar content, so won't really help you lose weight, nor are they 'healthier'.

The other point, HFCS is not widely used in Australia and in for example soft drinks. Instead we use cane sugar - here it is thought that when the body turns HFCS into energy, it creates too-high levels of the unhealthy triglyceride fats in the process. So, even though too much sugar is not good for us, the body seems to handle it better than HFCS.

100 posted on 04/05/2012 1:39:36 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: odds; Mase
HFCS is not widely used in Australia and in for example soft drinks. Instead we use cane sugar - here it is thought that when the body turns HFCS into energy, it creates too-high levels of the unhealthy triglyceride fats in the process.

That is what Lustig also claims, but not sure if Mase, who bitterly disagrees with his overall thesis, agrees.

112 posted on 04/05/2012 5:47:53 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson