We agree that the Courts may review laws when we think it is appropriate. Astonishing.
Pabianice, I have looked at the Holder letter, and I do not see this line in it. But for the benefit of the doubt, could you point me to where it is?
Or anywhere, for that matter. I’ve searched the internet for it, and nada.
Nor do I. The closest is: "The Supreme Court has further explained that this power may only be exercised in appropriate cases . " Then a few sentences later Holder writes that "we have argued that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case."
So the essence is true - that Obama and his henchmen feel the SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in this case, and as such, doesn't agree that it's appropriate for the court to rule on it.