Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

“We agree that the Courts may review laws when we think it is appropriate.” Astonishing.

Pabianice, I have looked at the Holder letter, and I do not see this line in it. But for the benefit of the doubt, could you point me to where it is?


23 posted on 04/05/2012 12:30:00 PM PDT by Heartlander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander2

Or anywhere, for that matter. I’ve searched the internet for it, and nada.


26 posted on 04/05/2012 12:31:55 PM PDT by Heartlander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
I do not see this line in it.

Nor do I. The closest is: "The Supreme Court has further explained that this power may only be exercised in appropriate cases . " Then a few sentences later Holder writes that "we have argued that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the case."

So the essence is true - that Obama and his henchmen feel the SCOTUS has no jurisdiction in this case, and as such, doesn't agree that it's appropriate for the court to rule on it.

28 posted on 04/05/2012 12:54:39 PM PDT by noexcuses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson