Posted on 04/08/2012 8:26:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
Why is the federal government under President Barack Obama arguably tougher on medical marijuana operations than it was under George W. Bush? That's the question that anti-drug-war groups have been asking themselves for months.
In 2008, antiprohibitionists thought an Obama administration would not tread on medical marijuana dispensaries in states where they are legal. Obama's 2008 campaign spokesman, Ben LaBolt, told me Obama "believes that states and local governments are best-positioned to strike the balance between making sure that these policies are not abused for recreational drug use and making sure that doctors and their patients can safely access pain relief."
Now that Obama's in office, however, the Department of Justice is not allowing the 16 states that have legalized medical marijuana to self-regulate. Exactly the opposite: Last fall, U.S. attorneys in California warned landlords that they must evict medical marijuana clubs or risk having their assets seized. In October, the Internal Revenue Service informed dispensaries that they cannot declare standard tax deductions, because they are criminal enterprises.
"Drug kingpins and cartels don't file taxes. We do," Steve DeAngelo, director of medical marijuana giant Harborside Health Center, told MSNBC. "But no business, including ours, can survive if it is taxed on its gross revenue. The IRS is trying to tax us out of existence."
On Monday, the feds raided the apartment of and the medical marijuana businesses run by Richard Lee, the wheelchair-bound pro-marijuana activist who put more than $1 million into the 2010 Proposition 19 campaign to legalize marijuana in California.
According to news reports, Lee's supporters came out to protest the raid, and some punctuated their point by lighting up in public. Such antics reinforce law enforcement's suspicion that recreational users are hiding behind the skirts of medical marijuana.
The thing is that Obama the candidate said he'd let locals decide how to handle any abuses, and there is local enforcement. According to the office of California Attorney General Kamala Harris, there were 16,585 felony marijuana arrests in 2010. Some cities go after dispensaries suspected of illegal trafficking; others choose to use their resources on higher priorities. (Lee points out that Oakland police were detailed to control crowds that had gathered to protest the raid on his Oaksterdam University on the day of the horrific Oikos University shootings.)
An Obama official informed me that the administration has not changed positions. The administration always maintained that federal officials have the authority -- indeed, a duty -- under the Controlled Substances Act to go after traffickers who use medical marijuana as a pretext.
But Kris Hermes, spokesman for Americans for Safe Access, sees an escalation in federal raids. "Arrests have not been made every time there's been a raid," Hermes observed. "We call them 'smash and grab.' DEA agents come in, guns drawn -- ski masks, even. They destroy the place. They take everything" -- computers, money, plants.
This is what bothers me: The feds can use their ability to raid and to intimidate landlords without having to prove anything in court.
Lee's attorney, Laurence Jeffrey Lichter, told me U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag has not charged his client, and he hopes she will not. To Lichter, raiding without charging beats prosecuting club operators.
Hermes, however, has big issues with Justice's big-footing. He sees an aggressive campaign to drive medical marijuana clubs out of business -- even if that means cutting off sick people's access to the drug.
"What happens if they're successful?" Harborside's DeAngelo asked. "Cannabis doesn't go away. Medical cannabis doesn't go away." Marijuana instead goes to the street, and the money winds up with "the Mexican cartels."
"Why are such resources, at a time of fiscal crisis, being used to go after a community that has such political support?" Hermes asked. One factor, no doubt, is that Attorney General Eric "Holder and Obama have basically been given a free ride by the mainstream media, and no one's really holding them to account."
Rep. Ron Paul -- the GOP presidential candidate who opposes Washington's war on drugs -- spoke with the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board Thursday. Asked about the Oakland raids, Paul opined that it's "all political," a calculation of the sort made in election years. But it's bad politics that don't keep up with how the country is changing.
Last month, pollster Scott Rasmussen reported that 47 percent of Americans support legalizing marijuana to help alleviate the country's fiscal woes, while 42 percent oppose legalization.
So why is Obama the drug war's new Rambo?
Candidate Paul concluded, "I think they're out of touch."
They are not some sick person with cancer growing a few plants in their back yard.
The are Criminals that are growing hundreds of plants under 215 and selling it out of state.
I have no use for Dopers, There is no reason to smoke pot or use drugs.
Nancy Reagan said it best “ Just Say No”.
They are not some sick person with cancer growing a few plants in their back yard.
The are Criminals that are growing hundreds of plants under 215 and selling it out of state.
How are they killing people by growing plants?
I have no use for Dopers, There is no reason to smoke pot or use drugs.
There is no more reason to drink alcohol or smoke tobacco; shall we ban those too?
Many, many more people drive drunk and cause accidents using alcohol. Should we ban alcohol as well? How about cigarettes? Shouldn’t we ban those as well, because of secondhand smoke and the toll taken by lung cancer and emphysema?
Are you going to be consistent with your jihad against drugs, or are you going to be selective and only go after *some* drugs? Should alcohol and tobacco users be hanged as well?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.