Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredArmy

I was thinking the same thing, "80 Communist Party Members In U.S. House", Col. West is definitely low-balling it.

9 posted on 04/11/2012 11:23:19 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing

I’m assuming that he means members of the Progressive Caucus of the Democratic Socialists of America.

They used to post the list of Congressional members on the DSA web site, along with an essay that explained how they came to call themselves “progressives” instead of “socialists”. The explanation was, and I’m not kidding, that the DSA was interested in organizing the Black voters, but Blacks were scared off by the term, “socialist” and didn’t really understand what it meant, so they chose to call themselves, “Progressives”.

Back in the 90’s, about the time that the Republicans took control of Congress, the list of Congressional members who held membership in both the Democrat Party and the Democratic Socialists of America, became controversial and the many of those on the list blamed the open list of names by the DSA for the loss of Congress to the Republicans. So, the DSA revised their web site and removed the list and the reference to the dual party membership, as well as some of the essays and list of sponsors from the web site.

In other words, they made the site very boring.


34 posted on 04/11/2012 12:24:32 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson