Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama on Reagan: a ‘wild-Eyed, Socialist, Tax-Hiking Class Warrior'
ABC News ^ | April 11, 2012 | Olivier Knox

Posted on 04/11/2012 2:25:32 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Today's Republicans might view Ronald Reagan as a "wild-eyed, socialist, tax-hiking class warrior," and the late conservative icon's views on taxes might have disqualified him from the party's nomination in 2012, President Barack Obama said Wednesday.

Obama, defending his "Buffett Rule" call for higher taxes on the very rich, said in a speech that he was "not the first president to call for this idea that everybody has got to do their fair share." He went on to say:

Some years ago, one of my predecessors traveled across the country pushing for the same concept. He gave a speech where he talked about a letter he had received from a wealthy executive who paid lower tax rates than his secretary, and wanted to come to Washington and tell Congress why that was wrong. So this President gave another speech where he said it was 'crazy'--that's a quote--that certain tax loopholes make it possible for multimillionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary. That wild-eyed, socialist, tax-hiking class warrior was Ronald Reagan.

He thought that, in America, the wealthiest should pay their fair share, and he said so. I know that position might disqualify him from the Republican primaries these days but what Ronald Reagan was calling for then is the same thing that we're calling for now: a return to basic fairness and responsibility; everybody doing their part. And if it will help convince folks in Congress to make the right choice, we could call it the Reagan Rule instead of the Buffett Rule.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; onetermobama; reagan; reagansocialist; taxes; whatishesmoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: juno67

I thought everyone had to pay social security and medicare,....All my life the Democrats said SS, Medicare was NOT a tax, it was a contribution. Now, when they want to destroy both, they ask for a cut in the payroll tax. Why am I confused?


41 posted on 04/13/2012 1:41:36 AM PDT by Safetgiver (The predator class is upset because they are being shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

Life is confusing, and then, when you start to get it figured out a bit, you die.

Everyone pays social security and medicare if they are ordinary working stiffs. But those who manage to make an income from rents, royalties, dividends, interest, capital gains (and ?) are exempted from this obligation, getting an instant 15.3% tax cut as compared to the ordinary riff-raff. Also, if you have a really good job and make over $110,100 in 2012, you won’t owe payroll taxes over that amount. Once again, it pays not to be a regular working guy. What a shock...


42 posted on 04/14/2012 12:28:43 AM PDT by juno67 (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson