To: GlockThe Vote
What if it was Hitler running, saying he’d exterminate 100% of the Jews, but “Mittler” running saying he’d be more selective and only exterminate 85% of them? Isn’t there a point where your conscience dictates you lodge a protest vote and don’t help EITHER of these guys get any power? If one party loses enough, eventually they would change their positions to what the voters want if only for their own survival.
150 posted on
04/11/2012 9:00:03 PM PDT by
JediJones
(From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
To: JediJones
Straw man argument. regardless. Would vote for jack the ripper, son of sam, or BTK Killer over Obama as of today.
HE. NEEDS TO GO!!!
162 posted on
04/11/2012 9:03:40 PM PDT by
GlockThe Vote
(The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
To: JediJones
The difference is that Romney is not saying that. He is saying that he has had a change of heart.
How I wish we had spent the last 3 years holding McCain to his promises rather than watching O keep his.
597 posted on
04/12/2012 2:56:02 AM PDT by
hocndoc
(WingRight.org: Have mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it. 2 men inherited a Bush economy.)
To: JediJones; true believer forever; VinL; katiedidit1
Ping to comment #150.
Definitely not a throw away line!
773 posted on
04/12/2012 9:14:08 AM PDT by
RitaOK
(LET 'ER RIP, NEWT.)
To: JediJones
"
What if it was Hitler running, saying he’d exterminate 100% of the Jews, but “Mittler” running saying he’d be more selective and only exterminate 85% of them?"
I would think that the other 15% wll be coming along later.
790 posted on
04/12/2012 9:33:32 AM PDT by
YHAOS
(you betcha!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson