Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama campaign runs from strategist's insult on Ann Romney
FOX NEWS ^ | 4/12/12

Posted on 04/12/2012 6:47:45 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: refermech

“’IMHO’ !!! You said a mouthful! And all true!!”

In the place where the definition of ‘Progressive’ is, should be the picture of a snake;

IMHO (once again.)


81 posted on 04/12/2012 11:36:57 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

The strategy of letting Obama win because Romney is not conservative enough is a bad one. Please think more clearly before you promote this plan. There is a huge difference between Romney and Obama.


82 posted on 04/12/2012 11:49:45 AM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Obama campaign runs from strategist’s insult on
Ann Romney.”

Those scu*bags have no regard for anyone who falls outside of the goose-stepping, lockstep world of the Progressive.

They hate Christians, so-called stay-at-home moms who lovingly tend their children, veterans (whom they have judged as potential terror threats) and many others.

Definition of Progressive should include references to pestilence, demonics, obfuscation, fabrications and all manner of skullduggery.

IMHO


83 posted on 04/12/2012 11:56:43 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements
The strategy of letting Obama win because Romney is not conservative enough is a bad one. Please think more clearly before you promote this plan. There is a huge difference between Romney and Obama.

It's not that Romney isn't conservative "enough". Santorum was not conservative enough for my tastes, in terms of spending and the size of government. It's that Romney isn't conservative. It's also not about "letting" Obama win. It's essentially a protest vote. My vote for Romney (and even a hypothetical vote for that liberal disgusts me) could not change the outcome of the election. If the GOP is going to go with a nominee more liberal than half the Dem nominees in my lifetime, they can do it without me - and even when the Dems are again threatening us with the most dangerous threat to America in our country's history, refusing to vote for Romney makes sense in a state that republicans cannot win.

Note: I very strongly oppose the idea of staying home on election day. I continue to remind the anti-Romney FR voters that we have to go to the polls even if we're stuck with that pro-abortion, anti-gun, big government liberal at the head of the ticket. Especially if it's Romney or Obama, we need as conservative a Congress as possible to limit the damage that the White House inflicts on our country.

84 posted on 04/12/2012 12:27:57 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Heaven help us all.


85 posted on 04/12/2012 1:16:34 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
OBOZO has NEVER WORKED a DAY in HIS LIFE!
86 posted on 04/12/2012 1:23:17 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson