Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cymbeline

How do you know this is a plan he would carry out, his entire political history is one of spin and flip flops.
There is not a position he has maintained even the slightest bit of constancy on.


12 posted on 04/12/2012 7:36:02 AM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: svcw

Nobody will be able to argue that Romney will actually do anything he has promised. We don’t know the future.

While Newt is still viable, there’s no reason to compromise.

But we know what Obama has promised to do. And we KNOW that Obama won’t do what we want.

As a general rule, I’d rather vote for a guy who promises to do what is right, even if I don’t trust them, than vote for a guy who promises to do what is bad, in the hopes they actually do right instead.

For example, I wouldn’t vote for a pro-choice candidate — how could I give my vote to a guy who promises to support abortion? But I can vote for a candidate who promises to support pro-life positions, if the opponents are pro-abortion, even if that is a change from past positions, since I am voting for the promise. Then I can hold the candidate accountable for breaking the promise.


20 posted on 04/12/2012 9:41:00 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson