Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

When the first 75 or so rounds don’t do the job.

Question is, does a human body stand/sit upright after being shot the first 80 or so times? So, is it necessary to keep shooting a slumped body? I don’t know the exact circumstances (filtered through the corrupt MSM) but this seems hard to understand what the police were thinking.


6 posted on 04/13/2012 9:58:58 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Obadiah

Didn’t say he got hit that many times. “Shot at”


9 posted on 04/13/2012 10:02:10 AM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

You’re assuming they actually hit him that many times.


11 posted on 04/13/2012 10:04:02 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

This is probably why DHS ordered 500 million rounds..


12 posted on 04/13/2012 10:04:36 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

Review of the 911 call gave the cops every reason in the world to do what they did.


15 posted on 04/13/2012 10:06:16 AM PDT by FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

If 10 police officers fire 9 rounds each (4 or 5 seconds), 90 rounds converge rather quickly.

If any of them re-loaded and fired, I’d investigate. Otherwise, it’s suicide by cop.


24 posted on 04/13/2012 10:18:05 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

100 rounds in 5 seconds...

100 Round Glock
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4ZivnRZG5Q

Oh and I want one!


29 posted on 04/13/2012 10:20:39 AM PDT by TSgt (The only reason I have one in the chamber at all times, is because it is impossible to have two in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah

I wouldn’t be surprised if the officers were 40 to 50 feet away from the perp at the time of the shooting. I haven’t seen the video yet, but it’s reasoned to think the officers would fire until the perp went down. If he continued to hold his hands out in a firing stance, I’d still consider him to be a threat.

What would be your take on things if you stopped after firing two shots, and one of your fellow officers was shot dead shortly thereafter? Would his wife and kids be comforted by your efforts to keep the bullet count down?

If the guy demonstrates the behavior this guy did, you take him down. Only ONE PERSON is responsible for what took place. It was the dead perp.

If I ever take a shooting stance against the police in a similar situation, I give them permission up front to take me out.


40 posted on 04/13/2012 10:30:44 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (I believe in Cap and Trade. I know, I know... Cap spending and trade Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Obadiah
When the first 75 or so rounds don’t do the job.

Yeah, well, there's always the case of Mark Essex - "An autopsy later revealed more than 200 gunshot wounds." -Wiki

Not that Essex didn't have it coming, but...I remember reading in a true crime book that during the hunt, some cops were wounded by ricochets from the amount of rounds that they were pouring into an enclosed area.

48 posted on 04/13/2012 10:50:10 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson