He is clearly stating, and has said so, many times in the past, that under no circumstances will he ever vote for Romney.
Therefore, he has three choices available:
1. Vote for Obama
2. Cast NO vote for president.
3. Write-in a name, which, though I am no expert in election law, may, in some jurisdictions, invalidate his entire ballot.
There are no other options that I am aware of.
As he is loudly saying that he will NOT vote for Romney under any circumstances, it is not unreasonable, given the degree of influence that he has that he is advocating such a position for others.
And so, I repeat..again..such a policy, could easily result in Obama's reelection. My example of what could have happened in Florida in 2000 is valid...
Therefore, it is not unreasonable for me to ask if Jim, and others, are willing to accept such a result.
I can't, therefore, as I said, I will hold my nose and vote for Romney. I will devote my time, and such contributions as I choose, to candidates I believe will make a difference. Here in Florida, we must see that ASlan West is re-elected, and we have a great chance to retire Nelson.
But again, instead of snide comments.."go to DU"...you refuse to confront the key question head on..since Jim has yet to respond, I will ask you...do you honestly think this country will be better off if Obama is re-elected, as opposed to Romney, and are you willing to accept that consequence. I've read, and reread your several posts, and have yet to see you clearly answer the question.
Absolutely. And of course. I assume you refuse to accept this premise, but I will tell you why anyway. A Romney presidency will be a placeholder presidency. Romney will not work to remove Obamacare; he will try to work around the edges. Romney will not appoint conservative justices; he will appoint justices that are palatable to the leftists. In other words, Romney will behave exactly as he behaved when he was governor of Massachusetts.
And the Republicans in the House and Senate will be severely disinclined to fight the leader of their party.
But that is not the worst part. The worst part is what will happen after the Romney inauguration. The person leading the inaugural ceremonies next January is Senator Chuck Schumer. Seconds after the inauguration has ended, Schumer will run to the cameras (as is his wont) and announce to the country that "It's Romney's economy now!"
From that moment on, the DemocRATs and their lapdogs in the media will work to put the entire blame for the economic collapse on Romney and the Republicans. Then, in 2016, the DemocRATs will come roaring back with the message "We TOLD YOU SO!"
At least with Obama and strong Republican majorities in the House and Senate, Obama can be contained - and the Republicans WILL be inclined to do that.
Of course, I assume you will dismiss my reasoning, because for some reason you believe that an Obama presidency would be much much worse. Believe what you want - but stop browbeating us conservatives who know what kind of a man Romney is.
At least we can still fight for Newt. Maybe God will bless our nation and prevent Romney from being the candidate.
That is what I said, he said 'He' won't. He NEVER told anyone else not to. You were p*^^ing and moaning that he told others not to vote. You can't keep your own complaint straight. Truly a mittbot - Mitt can't keep his stories straight either.
---------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, he has three choices available:
1. Vote for Obama
YOU aren't as swift as you think you are - that shows MORE about you, it actually shows me more about you than you care I know. I have discernment.
2. Cast NO vote for president.
3. Write-in a name, which, though I am no expert in election law, may, in some jurisdictions, invalidate his entire ballot.
MORE OF YOUR DRAMA QUEEN Antics! Nothing like saying something and then saying you don't know. Try not saying anything, but that wouldn't suit your agenda.
YOU are a mittbot. That lying empty suit is evil-filled! Check his record in MA - that slacker has a disastrous record there. He's such a liar, he reeks of evil. Right in front of millions on national TV he spoke how good things were during his admin when Perry brought it up. He has no shame, evil can't because it's evil.
That chump bought off enough people to vote for him and to speak good of him, now he has them lying. Touch mitt and your tainted for life! Take his begging somewhere else. This is a conservative site - we have not use for a pro homo, pro baby killing LIBERAL candidate. GO TO DU! Don't peddle him here.
it is not unreasonable, given the degree of influence that he has that he is advocating such a position for others.
It is not unreasonable given Mitt's degree of influence that he has MORE than enough people he BOUGHT off to vote for him. So if anyone votes for him make sure the pimp pays you. He BOUGHT the primary so far - He has no record to earn votes. SO the "LIBERAL" had to pay others to support him. He probably paid off kids to play with him in his younger years. He's NOTHING but an IMPOSTER in the GOP! He doesn't belong in the GOP race. The man is mental and shows a great NEED of 'getting things' because he is so void of anything good inside.
I KNOW TOO MUCH ABOUT YOU so I prefer you NOT post to me any longer.