Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee

That might be the case if it was just one guy. But it doesn’t sound like it was just one agent/one hooker.
Now, maybe his beef was actually with the hotel wanting the $47, not the hooker, and that’s what started the argument.

Either way, shouldn’t have been boozing, and shouldn’t have been womanizing. No excuses.


46 posted on 04/15/2012 6:40:21 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: nuconvert
"Either way, shouldn’t have been boozing, and shouldn’t have been womanizing. No excuses."

Never served overseas in the military, did you?

Do you know why R&R is also referred to as I&I?

54 posted on 04/15/2012 6:46:58 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: nuconvert

It is called defrauding an innkeeper. The broad was in the room all night and the hotel wanted payment.


89 posted on 04/15/2012 7:36:01 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson