Yeah, you posted “comparisons,” not “implications.” Right. Let me try to post some “comparisons” as well:
“Ted Cruz fought the Obama Administration before the U.S. Supreme Court, while David Dewhurst did Obama’s bidding by making sure that TSA agents continued to grope passengers at Texas airports.”
“Ted Cruz’s father has been a stalwart opponent of Communism for more than five decades, while David Dewhurst’s father fought on the same side as Soviet Communist troops during the 1940s and never spoke out against the Communist takeover of Cuba.”
“Ted Cruz’s father took an oath renouncing his Cuban citizenship and adopting U.S. citizenship, while David Dewhurst’s father never took an oath renouncing Soviet citizenship.”
“Ted Cruz and his family worked to pay for his education, while David Dewhurst mooched off of taxpayers for his schooling.”
“Ted Cruz’s father supports his son’s Senate campaign, but David Dewhurst’s father has not spoken out in favor of his son’s candidacy.”
Those are just “facts,” with no implications, except in your mind.
Sure, except the first one. The Senate passed the TSA bill in the Special Session. They were very successful with many other laws during the regular and special session - when every lobbyist in Austin kept saying that nothing would happen other than the budget and redistricting.
You don’t have anything to support your attacks - other than the comments about what Dewhurst’s dead father didn’t do?